The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Catastrophe Model for Developing Service Satisfaction Strategies
Abstract
Customer satisfaction/dissatisfaction has become an important issue for marketing practitioners. The authors examine the issue in terms of customer service. In particular, practitioners and academicians have noted that simply investing in greater service delivery may not return the cost of the additional investment. Part of the problem is that customers’ response to service increments can be nonlinear, and satisfaction and dissatisfaction thresholds may not occur at the same point. The authors propose a method for analyzing this complex behavior in a way that can lead to the development of more accurate service strategies through an understanding of the relationships among customer-transaction costs, satisfaction, and purchase loyalty. They use a catastrophe model to describe a service loyalty customer-response surface. Then, by presenting a “real-world” application with a small service-quality customer dataset provided by General Electric Supply, they show how one actually estimates such a model and interprets the results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Self-citationOliver, R. L., & Swan, J. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300202 · Cited by 2,084
Self-citation
Cited by
Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing
Tax, S. S., Brown, S. W., & Chandrashekaran, M. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252161 · Cited by 2,723
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670502004003006 · Cited by 2,301
Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence
Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070301291002 · Cited by 2,002
Consumer Switching Costs: A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequences
Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302250897 · Cited by 1,858
Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments
Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281014 · Cited by 1,635
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliva, T. A., Oliver, R. L., & MacMillan, I. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 83-95
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2065813178
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.