The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage
Abstract
Managers use mental models of markets to simplify and impose order on complex and ambiguous competitive environments and isolate points of competitive advantage or deficiency. In this study of senior managers of 190 businesses, the authors found four different types of mental models or representations of competitive advantage, varying in the emphasis placed on customer or management judgments about where and how competitors differ. These representations were influenced equally by pressure points in the environment and choice of strategy. The type of representation was also strongly associated with constrained patterns of information search and usage, raising the possibility that the necessary simplifications and narrowing of perspective may come at the cost of myopia and insensitivity to challenges from unexpected directions. There was also a strong association between the completeness of the managerial representation and relative financial performance, which supports related studies on the profitability of a market orientation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279103 · Cited by 3,385
Alba, J. W., & Hasher, L. (1983) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.93.2.203 · Cited by 1,169
Environmental scanning for corporate planning
Fahey, L., & King, W. R. (1977) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/0007-6813(77)90010-6 · Cited by 249
Cited by
The Comparative Advantage Theory of Competition
Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299505900201 · Cited by 2,718
Market Orientation and Organizational Performance: Is Innovation a Missing Link?
Han, J. K., Kim, N., & Srivastava, R. K. (1998) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299806200403 · Cited by 2,613
Organizational Market Information Processes: Cultural Antecedents and New Product Outcomes
Moorman, C. (1995) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379503200307 · Cited by 1,020
Antecedents of Export Venture Performance: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Assessment
Morgan, N. A., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.90.24028 · Cited by 989
Firm-Level Export Performance Assessment: Review, Evaluation, and Development
Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, L. C., & Morgan, N. A. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300284003 · Cited by 892
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, G. S., & Nedungadi, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-04
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 31-44
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W1983662610
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 58.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224299405800203
- The paper
- Day, G. S., & Nedungadi, P. (1994). Managerial Representations of Competitive Advantage. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.