The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Company and the Product: Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses
Abstract
Although brand theorists suggest that what a person knows about a company (i.e., corporate associations) can influence perceptions of the company's products, little systematic research on these effects exists. The authors examine the effects of two general types of corporate associations on product responses: One focuses on the company's capabilities for producing products, that is, corporate ability (CA) associations, and the other focuses on the company's perceived social responsibility, that is, corporate social responsibility (CSR) associations. The results of three studies, including one that measures respondents’ CA and CSR associations for well-known companies and one that uses consumers recruited in a shopping mall, demonstrate that (1) what consumers know about a company can influence their beliefs about and attitudes toward new products manufactured by that company, (2) CA and CSR associations may have different effects on consumer responses to products, and (3) products of companies with negative associations are not always destined to receive negative responses. The authors conclude by discussing the implications of these findings for marketing managers and further research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 78
- Aaker David A., 1996, Building Strong Brands.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893 · DOI
- Barich Howard, 1991, Sloan Management Review, 32, 94
- 10.1016/0304-405X(86)90055-3 · DOI
- Belch George E., 1987, Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 232
- 10.1177/002224299505900404 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224295902400202 · DOI
- Bristol Lee H., 1960, Developing the Corporate image
- Carlson Robert O., 1963, The Corporation and Its Publics, 24
- 10.1177/002224376500200112 · DOI
- Cohen Louis, 1967, Journal of Advertising Research, 7, 32
- Cohen Reuben, 1963, The Corporation and Its Publics, 48
- The Conference Board (1994), “Corporate Contributions, 1992,” Report No. 1014 (January), The Conference Board, New York.
- 10.2307/3665543 · DOI
- Dacin Peter A., 1996, “Corporate Associations and Consumer Product Responses,”
- 10.1177/002224379403100207 · DOI
- Daughety Andrew F., 1987, Public Regulation: New Perspectives on Institutions and Policies, 346
- 10.1086/208539 · DOI
- 10.1016/0019-8501(86)90051-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/0024-6301(93)90141-2 · DOI
- 10.2307/2393235 · DOI · Paper page
- Embley L. Lawrence, 1993, Doing Well While Doing Good.
- 10.2307/41164076 · DOI
- Fombrun Charles J., 1996, Reputation: Realizing Value From the Corporate Image.
- 10.2307/256324 · DOI
- Garbett Thomas F., 1988, How to Build a Corporation's Identity and Project Its Image.
- Ghemawat Pankaj, 1986, Harvard Business Review, 64, 53
- 10.1086/208547 · DOI · Paper page
- Gregory James R., 1991, Marketing Corporate Image: The Company as Your #1 Product.
- 10.1002/smj.4250140804 · DOI
- Hardy Kenneth G., 1970, Business Quarterly, 35, 70
- 10.1086/209194 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4 · DOI
- Higgins E. Tory, 1981, Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction, 69
- 10.2307/1249636 · DOI
- Johnson Madeline, 1990, Developments in Marketing Science, 13, 346
- Joreskog Karl G., 1993, LISREL 8.
- 10.1177/002224299305700101 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224379202900104 · DOI
- Keller Kevin Lane, 1994, “Managing the Corporate Brand: The Effects of Corporate Images and Corporate Brand Extensions,”
- 10.1108/EUM0000000005007 · DOI
- Keppel Geoffrey, 1991, Design & Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook
- 10.1108/07363769110035144 · DOI
- Kinnear Thomas C., 1995, 1994 Survey of Marketing Research.
- 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90030-8 · DOI
- 10.1086/209260 · DOI
- 10.1086/209155 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.28 · DOI
- Marketing Science Institute, 1992, Research Priorities 1992–1994.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.27 · DOI
- Martineau Pierre, 1958, Harvard Business Review, 36, 47
- Martineau Pierre, 1958, Harvard Business Review, 36, 49
- 10.1177/014920639001600112 · DOI
- Mertes John E., 1971, MSU Business Topics, 19, 35
- 10.1177/002224379303000307 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-0531(82)90031-X · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250110703 · DOI
- Olins Wally, 1989, Corporate Identity.
- Pharoah Neale, 1982, Journal of the Market Research Society, 24, 240
- Riahi-Belkaoui Ahmed, 1992, Accounting for Corporate Reputation.
- 10.1080/00913367.1991.10673346 · DOI
- 10.2307/1881782 · DOI · Paper page
- Sherif Muzafer, 1961, Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change.
- 10.1086/208894 · DOI
- 10.1086/208572 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02894607 · DOI
- Smith Geoffrey, 1994, Business Week, 42
- Smith Geoffrey, 1994, Business Week, 64
- 10.1177/002224296102500608 · DOI
- 10.2307/1249536 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224298805200306 · DOI
- Wansink Brian, 1989, Advances in Consumer Research, 16, 399
- 10.1016/0022-1031(87)90034-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/smj.4250090505 · DOI
- Winters Lewis C., 1986, Journal of Advertising Research, 26, 54
- Winters Lewis C., 1988, Journal of Advertising Research, 28, 11
- Wyer Robert S., 1980, Social Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, 161
- Wyer Robert S., 1980, Cognitive Bases of Impression Formation and Person Memory, 227
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838 · Cited by 4,659
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609 · Cited by 3,336
Doing better at doing good: When, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166284 · Cited by 2,320
Barnett, M. L. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520 · Cited by 2,060
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10218 · Cited by 1,916
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Southern Methodist University (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- ORCID
- Brown, Tom J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-84
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2329745760
- Cited by
- 4,197
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 99 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 192 · 2022: 197 · 2021: 184 · 2020: 259 · 2019: 223 · 2018: 258 · 2017: 246 · 2016: 282 · 2015: 254 · 2014: 264 · 2013: 245 · 2012: 233
- FWCI
- 50.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Keywords
- business associations, corporate ability, corporate social responsibility, brand knowledge, consumer perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review