The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination
Abstract
Although the role of market knowledge competence in enhancing new product advantage is assumed widely in the literature, empirical studies are lacking because of an absence of the concept definition. In this study, the authors conceptualize market knowledge competence as the processes that generate and integrate market knowledge. The authors test the conceptual model using data collected from the software industry. The findings show that each of the three processes of market knowledge competence exerts a positive influence on new product advantage. The results also reveal a positive association between new product advantage and product market performance. The findings regarding the antecedents indicate that the perceived importance of market knowledge by top management has the largest impact on the processes of market knowledge competence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage
Barney, J. (1991) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639101700108 · Cited by 48,334
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Fit Indexes, Lagrange Multipliers, Constraint Changes and Incomplete Data in Structural Models
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_3 · Cited by 512
Cited by
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255 · Cited by 6,674
Walter, A., Auer, M., & Ritter, T. (2006) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.005 · Cited by 1,222
Resource-based theory in marketing
Kozlenkova, I. V., Samaha, S. A., & Palmatier, R. W. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-013-0336-7 · Cited by 882
Lin, Y., & Wu, L.-Y. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.12.019 · Cited by 783
Ritter, T., & Gemünden, H. G. (2003) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00259-4 · Cited by 777
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, T., & Calantone, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 13-29
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2015808835
- Cited by
- 1,348
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 38.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224299806200402
- The paper
- Li, T., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). The Impact of Market Knowledge Competence on New Product Advantage: Conceptualization and Empirical Examination. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
