The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Model of Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational Constraint
Abstract
A multiattribute judgment model is advanced which is purported to characterize how consumers form evaluations of products when information about products’ attributes is limited and variability or unreliability is present within attributes. The model is based on the hypothesis that the subjective value consumers associate with a product attribute can be represented in terms of a weighted average of the value of the information they have received about that attribute and the perceived mean value of that attribute within the product class. This average is integrated with the consumer's perception of the amount of variability both within and between other alternatives on that attribute—a measure of uncertainty. A series of laboratory experiments testing aspects of the model are described. Results support both the model's predictions and aspects of its structure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The antecedents and consequences of customer satisfaction for firms
Anderson, E. W., & Sullivan, M. W. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.2.125 · Cited by 4,610
Determinants and Effects of the Use of ″Made in″ Labels
Johansson, J. K. (1989) · International Marketing Review · doi:10.1108/eum0000000001502 · Cited by 351
Do people treat missing information adaptively when making inferences?
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2009) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210802602615 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 428-441
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2321315841
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Model of Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational Constraint. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224378101800404
- The paper
- Meyer, R. J. (1981). A Model of Multiattribute Judgments under Attribute Uncertainty and Informational Constraint. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.