The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review
Abstract
Over the past few years hybrid models for conjoint analysis have been developed to reduce data collection effort and time. Hybrid models combine features of self-explicated utility measurement with more traditional conjoint analysis. A classification of hybrid models is presented, followed by a review of their comparative performance in cross-validation tests. Though hybrid models represent an attempt to cope with an important practical problem in industry applications of conjoint techniques, these models entail a number of untested assumptions requiring further theoretical analysis and empirical research. Suggestions are offered on future studies that are essential before the role of hybrid models in conjoint methods can be evaluated properly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conjoint Analysis in Marketing: New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice
Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400402 · Cited by 2,687
Self-citationGriffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.1.1 · Cited by 1,914
The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research
McFadden, D. (1986) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.5.4.275 · Cited by 1,300
Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: An Update
Wittink, D. R., & Cattin, P. (1989) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298905300310 · Cited by 785
Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy: Review and Agenda for Research
Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., Sharpe, A., Sirgy, J., & Vogel, J. (2001) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1023/a:1010811312332 · Cited by 629
Metadata
- Authors
- Green, P. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1984-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-169
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2329472790
- Cited by
- 324
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224378402100204
- The paper
- Green, P. E. (1984). Hybrid Models for Conjoint Analysis: An Expository Review. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378402100204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.