The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Abstract
The authors use meta-analysis techniques to investigate the evidence that has been gathered on the determinants of salespeople's performance. A search of the published and unpublished literature uncovered 116 articles (the list of which is available upon request) that yielded 1653 reported associations between performance and determinants of that performance. The results indicate the determinants can be ordered in the following way in terms of the average size of their association with performance: (1) role variables, (2) skill, (3) motivation, (4) personal factors, (5) aptitude, and (6) organizational/environmental factors. When ordered according to the amount of the observed variation in correlations across studies that is real variation (i.e., not attributable to sampling error), the determinants rank as follows: (1) personal factors, (2) skill, (3) role variables, (4) aptitude, (5) motivation, and (6) organizational/environmental factors. To investigate whether the associations between each of the categories of predictors and performance could be partially accounted for by the presence of moderator variables, the results were broken out by customer type, product type, and type of dependent measure used. The results indicate that the strength of the relationship between the major determinants and salespeople's performance is affected by the type of products salespeople sell. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for sales managers and researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research
GLASS, G. V. (1976) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x005010003 · Cited by 4,890
Cited by
Ellis, P. D. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761676 · Cited by 2,461
The Management of Customer-Contact Service Employees: An Empirical Investigation
Hartline, M. D., & Ferrell, O. C. (1996) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299606000406 · Cited by 1,920
Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments
Perreault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3172601 · Cited by 1,575
Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1192 · Cited by 1,262
Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (1998) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00002-0 · Cited by 890
Metadata
- Authors
- Churchill, G. A., Ford, N. M., Hartley, S. W., & Walker, O. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 103-118
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W4252118620
- Cited by
- 559
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224378502200201
- The paper
- Churchill, G. A., Ford, N. M., Hartley, S. W., & Walker, O. C. (1985). The Determinants of Salesperson Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378502200201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.