The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes
Abstract
Conventional product differentiation strategies prescribe distinguishing a product or brand from competitors’ on the basis of an attribute that is relevant, meaningful, and valuable to consumers. However, brands also successfully differentiate on an attribute that appears to create a meaningful product difference but on closer examination is irrelevant to creating that benefit—“meaningless” differentiation. The authors examine how meaningless differentiation can produce a meaningfully differentiated brand. They argue that buyers may infer that a distinguishing but irrelevant attribute is in fact relevant and valuable under certain conditions, creating a meaningfully differentiated brand. They outline the consumer inference process and develop a set of hypotheses about when it will produce meaningful brands from meaningless differentiation. Experimental tests in three product categories support their analysis. They explore the implications of the results for product differentiation strategies, consumer preference formation, and the nature of competition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process
Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1978.4305755 · Cited by 4,527
Cited by
Developing and validating measures of facets of customer-based brand equity
Netemeyer, R. G., Krishnan, B., Pullig, C., Wang, G., Yagci, M., Dean, D., Ricks, J., & Wirth, F. (2004) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(01)00303-4 · Cited by 1,313
(1997) · Sloan management review · Cited by 1,043
Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x · Cited by 475
The customer value proposition: evolution, development, and application in marketing
Payne, A., Frow, P., & Eggert, A. (2017) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-017-0523-z · Cited by 440
Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending
Michels, J. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50159 · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Carpenter, G. S., Glazer, R., & Nakamoto, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-350
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2059329554
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002224379403100302
- The paper
- Carpenter, G. S., Glazer, R., & Nakamoto, K. (1994). Meaningful Brands from Meaningless Differentiation: The Dependence on Irrelevant Attributes. Journal of Marketing Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379403100302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.