The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controlling Supplier Opportunism in Industrial Relationships
Abstract
The recent marketing literature reflects a growing interest in relationship management issues. In particular, several recent studies have drawn on transaction cost and agency theory to examine how interfirm relationships are organized. The general premise is that explicit control mechanisms must be deployed in a relationship to manage a partner's potential opportunism. Although previous research has shown that different mechanisms can be used, the tendency has been to examine individual mechanisms in isolation. The authors develop hypotheses about interdependences between different control mechanisms. They also identify some of the contextual factors that influence their use. The framework is tested empirically by examining how chemical manufacturers organize their supplier relationships. The results generally support the hypothesis that firms’ choices among control mechanisms are influenced by contextual factors. Only limited support is found for the hypothesis that interdependencies exist between different mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Determinants of Long-Term Orientation in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Ganesan, S. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800201 · Cited by 6,741
The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels
Anderson, E., & Weitz, B. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900103 · Cited by 3,431
CONDUCTING INTERORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH USING KEY INFORMANTS.
KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W., & ANDERSON, J. C. (1993) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256824 · Cited by 2,467
Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224379202900303 · Cited by 1,901
Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291393 · Cited by 1,481
Cited by
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231 · Cited by 745
SAFEGUARDING INVESTMENTS IN ASYMMETRIC INTERORGANIZATIONAL RELATIONSHIPS: THEORY AND EVIDENCE.
Subramani, M. R., & Venkatraman, N. (2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/30040675 · Cited by 377
Leonidou, L. C., Kvasova, O., Leonidou, C. N., & Chari, S. (2013) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1267-9 · Cited by 138
Hwang, J., Chung, J.-E., & Jin, B. (2013) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-10-2012-0107 · Cited by 21
Dellermann, D., & Reck, F. (2017) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2017.638 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Stump, R. L., & Heide, J. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 431-441
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2324299297
- Cited by
- 717
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
