Cited by 745Global trade, sustainability, and social impactCorporate Social Responsibility ReportingQuality and Management Systems

Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation

Christmann, Petra, Taylor, Glen·2006·Journal of International Business Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christmann, P., & Taylor, G.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Tampa (US)
Corresponding author
Christmann, Petra
Venue
Journal of International Business Studies
Published
2006-09-07
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
863-878
ISSN
  • 0047-2506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1478-6990
OpenAlex
W1995357280
Cited by
745
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 46
FWCI
28.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of International Business Studies (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
Keywords
ISO certification, corporate social responsibility, consumer preferences, customer monitoring, supplier certification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review