Armed Conflict, 1989—2006
Open accessAbstract
In 2006, 32 armed conflicts were active, a figure that has remained constant for three years. The decline in armed conflict observed through most of the post-Cold War period has ceased, at least temporarily. Many of the conflicts active in 2006 have a long history, which may have made them more entrenched and thus more difficult to solve. In fact, in contrast to the situation in the early 1990s, no new conflicts have erupted in the last two years. No interstate conflicts were active in 2006, but five of the intrastate conflicts were internationalized. While four of the conflicts recorded for 2005 were no longer active in 2006, four conflicts restarted, two with actions taken by new rebel groups and two by previously recorded actors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Coding of the PCJ data focuses specifically on justice processes related to individual conflicts as recorded by the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset (ACD), ensuring that the processes included in the analysis directly relate to the conflict of interest addressing conflict-induced grievances.
“Second, coding of the data focuses specifically on justice processes related to individual conflicts 15 as recorded by the UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset (ACD) (Gleditsch, Wallensteen, Eriksson, Sollenberg, and Strand 2002;Harbom and Wallensteen 2007).This ensures that the processes included in our analysis directly relate to the conflict of interest addressing conflict-induced grievances.”
From Conflict Recurrence and Postconflict Justice: Addressing Motivations and Opportunities for Sustainable Peace (2017) · cites this paper as Harbom and Wallensteen 2007
Cites
Armed Conflict 1946-2001: A New Dataset
GLEDITSCH, N. P., WALLENSTEEN, P., ERIKSSON, M., SOLLENBERG, M., & STRAND, H. (2002) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343302039005007 · Cited by 3,846 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tol, W. A., Stavrou, V., Greene, M. C., Mergenthaler, C., van Ommeren, M., & García Moreno, C. (2013) · Conflict and Health · doi:10.1186/1752-1505-7-16 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
“Data was obtained from the International Peace Research Institute (the Uppsala Conflict Data Program) [15-23] and the Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research [24-27].”
MethodPolitical violence and mental health: A multi-disciplinary review of the literature on Nepal
Tol, W. A., Kohrt, B. A., Jordans, M. J. D., Thapa, S. B., Pettigrew, J., Upadhaya, N., & de Jong, J. T. V. M. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.09.037 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Loyle, C. E., & Appel, B. J. (2017) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqx045 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Harbom, L., & Wallensteen, P.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Harbom, Lotta
- ORCID
- Wallensteen, Peter
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 623-634
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W2915670034
- Cited by
- 101
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 37.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics
- Keywords
- armed conflict, conflict trends, intrastate conflict, internationalization of conflict, rebel groups, post-Cold War conflicts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review