Cited by 137Gender, Security, and ConflictHealth and Conflict StudiesConflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia

Sexual and gender-based violence in areas of armed conflict: a systematic review of mental health and psychosocial support interventions

Open access
Tol, Wietse A, Stavrou, Vivi, Greene, M Claire, Mergenthaler, Christina, van Ommeren, Mark, García Moreno, Claudia·2013·Conflict and Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sexual and other forms of gender-based violence are common in conflict settings and are known risk factors for mental health and psychosocial wellbeing. We present findings from a systematic review of the academic and grey literature focused on the effectiveness of mental health and psychosocial support interventions for populations exposed to sexual and other forms of gender-based violence in the context of armed conflicts. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, PubMed/ Medline, psycINFO, and PILOTS, as well as grey literature to search for evaluations of interventions, without date limitations. RESULTS: Out of 5,684 returned records 189 full text papers were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies met inclusion criteria: 1 non-randomized controlled study; 3 non-controlled pre- post-test designs; 1 retrospective cohort with a matched comparison group; and 2 case studies. Studies were conducted in West and Central Africa; Albania; UK and USA, included female participants, and focused on individual and group counseling; combined psychological, medical, social and economic interventions; and cognitive behavioral therapy (two single case studies). CONCLUSIONS: The seven studies, while very limited, tentatively suggest beneficial effects of mental health and psychosocial interventions for this population, and show feasibility of evaluation and implementation of such interventions in real-life settings through partnerships with humanitarian organizations. Robust conclusions on the effectiveness of particular approaches are not possible on the basis of current evidence. More rigorous research is urgently needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1752-1505-7-16

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Although previous studies have evaluated effective treatment strategies with conflict-affected women and girls, there remains a paucity of knowledge on how to bring mental health supports to the required scale.

    “Although previous studies have evaluated effective treatment strategies with conflict-affected women and girls, 5,16 there remains a paucity of knowledge on how to bring mental health supports to the required scale. 17”

    From Guided self-help to reduce psychological distress in South Sudanese female refugees in Uganda: A cluster randomised trial (2020) · cites this paper as [17]

    Citation 17 is attached to the claim about bringing mental health supports to the required scale. The Background and Conclusions identify gaps in knowledge about intervention effectiveness and call for more research, but do not address how to deliver supports at scale (searched: scale, scale-up, and delivery capacity). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Wood EJ Sexual violence during war: explaining variation Order, Conflict and Violence Conference 2004 New Haven, CT: Yale University
  2. Dehaybi S Brief Systematic Review on the Prevalence, Factors, and Psychosocial Therapies Surrounding Global Sexual Violence 2011 Geneva: World Health Organization

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tol, W. A., Stavrou, V., Greene, M. C., Mergenthaler, C., van Ommeren, M., & García Moreno, C.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Tol, Wietse A
Venue
Conflict and Health
Published
2013-08-05
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
16-16
ISSN
1752-1505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158842686
Cited by
137
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Conflict and Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Security, and Conflict
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Conflict Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia
Keywords
sexual violence, gender-based violence, armed conflict, mental health interventions, psychosocial support, post-traumatic stress, cognitive behavioral therapy, group counseling, humanitarian organizations, conflict-affected populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review