Cited by 239Political Conflict and GovernanceEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsMarket Dynamics and Volatility

Global food prices, regime type, and urban unrest in the developing world

Hendrix, Cullen S, Haggard, Stephan·2015·Journal of Peace Research

Abstract

The 2014 IPCC report concludes that changes in precipitation and temperature could cause global food prices to nearly double by 2050. Anecdotal evidence of riots during the global food price spikes of 2007–08 and 2010–11 raises the more general question of whether global food prices affect patterns of contentious politics in developing countries. Drawing on a dataset of urban unrest in 55 major cities in 49 Asian and African countries for the period 1961–2010, we find the effect of global food prices on protests and rioting is contingent on regime type: democracies are more prone to urban unrest during periods of high food prices than autocracies. We show that this is due both to the more permissive political opportunity structure in democratic systems and to systematic differences in food policy across regimes of different types. Relative to autocracies, democracies pursue policies that are more favorable to the rural sector and less favorable to the cities. The findings have longer-run implications. To the extent that climate change will make many developing countries more dependent on food imports, and that prices could rise and be more volatile, we suggest another vector by which climate change may affect political unrest. Our findings highlight the importance of both political institutions and policy choices in mediating global shocks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022343314561599

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rendering staple foods unaffordable increases sense of relative deprivation, arouses grievances, and provides a political trigger with higher risk of protests, riots, and violent collective action.

    “Rendering staple foods unaffordable for the masses increases the sense of relative deprivation, arouses new and pre-existing grievances, and further provides a political trigger with a higher risk of protests, riots, and violent collective action (Bellemare 2015, Hendrix and Haggard 2015, Jones et al 2017, Ten Brink et al 2023).”

    From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Hendrix and Haggard 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hendrix, C. S., & Haggard, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Denver (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Hendrix, Cullen S
Venue
Journal of Peace Research
Published
2015-02-18
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
143-157
ISSN
  • 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-3578
OpenAlex
W2142194610
Cited by
239
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
39.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Denver
  • Army Research Office
  • Army Research Laboratory
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
Keywords
global food prices, urban unrest, political regimes, contentious politics, political opportunity structure, food policy, climate change, food import dependence, food price volatility, developing countries, political institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review