Global food prices, regime type, and urban unrest in the developing world
Abstract
The 2014 IPCC report concludes that changes in precipitation and temperature could cause global food prices to nearly double by 2050. Anecdotal evidence of riots during the global food price spikes of 2007–08 and 2010–11 raises the more general question of whether global food prices affect patterns of contentious politics in developing countries. Drawing on a dataset of urban unrest in 55 major cities in 49 Asian and African countries for the period 1961–2010, we find the effect of global food prices on protests and rioting is contingent on regime type: democracies are more prone to urban unrest during periods of high food prices than autocracies. We show that this is due both to the more permissive political opportunity structure in democratic systems and to systematic differences in food policy across regimes of different types. Relative to autocracies, democracies pursue policies that are more favorable to the rural sector and less favorable to the cities. The findings have longer-run implications. To the extent that climate change will make many developing countries more dependent on food imports, and that prices could rise and be more volatile, we suggest another vector by which climate change may affect political unrest. Our findings highlight the importance of both political institutions and policy choices in mediating global shocks.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rendering staple foods unaffordable increases sense of relative deprivation, arouses grievances, and provides a political trigger with higher risk of protests, riots, and violent collective action.
“Rendering staple foods unaffordable for the masses increases the sense of relative deprivation, arouses new and pre-existing grievances, and further provides a political trigger with a higher risk of protests, riots, and violent collective action (Bellemare 2015, Hendrix and Haggard 2015, Jones et al 2017, Ten Brink et al 2023).”
From The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways (2024) · cites this paper as Hendrix and Haggard 2015
Cites
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840 · see citing works
Rising food prices, food price volatility, and social unrest
Bellemare, M. F. (2015) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aau038 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
The food crises and political instability in north Africa and the Middle East
Lagi, M., Bertrand, K. Z., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1910031 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jones, B. T., Mattiacci, E., & Braumoeller, B. F. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316684662 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Living off the land: The connection between cropland, food security, and violence against civilians
Koren, O., & Bagozzi, B. E. (2017) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343316684543 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Resisting Lockdown: The Influence of COVID-19 Restrictions on Social Unrest
Wood, R., Reinhardt, G. Y., RezaeeDaryakenari, B., & Windsor, L. C. (2022) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqac015 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Climate change, the economy, and conflict
Koubi, V. (2017) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-017-0074-x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
The impacts of climate change on violent conflict risk: a review of causal pathways
Xie, X., Hao, M., Ding, F., Scheffran, J., Ide, T., Maystadt, J.-F., Qian, Y., Wang, Q., Chen, S., Wu, J., et al. (2024) · Environmental Research Communications · doi:10.1088/2515-7620/ad8a21 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Harris, J., Anderson, M., Clément, C., & Nisbett, N. (2019) · IDS Bulletin · doi:10.19088/1968-2019.112 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hendrix, C. S., & Haggard, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Denver (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hendrix, Cullen S
- Venue
- Journal of Peace Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-157
- ISSN
- 0022-3433 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3578
- OpenAlex
- W2142194610
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 39.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Peace Research (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Denver
- Army Research Office
- Army Research Laboratory
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Market Dynamics and Volatility
- Keywords
- global food prices, urban unrest, political regimes, contentious politics, political opportunity structure, food policy, climate change, food import dependence, food price volatility, developing countries, political institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review