Cited by 257Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisEducation Discipline and InequalityLegal and Social Justice Studies

The Cumulative Effect of Race and Ethnicity in Juvenile Court Outcomes and Why Preadjudication Detention Matters

Rodriguez, Nancy·2010·Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency

Abstract

Despite federal and state legislation aimed at producing equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile court system, studies continue to find that race and ethnicity play a significant role in juvenile court outcomes. To date, few studies have examined the cumulative effects of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes. In this study, a random sample of youth processed in Arizona during 2000 (N = 23,156) was used to examine how race and ethnicity influence diversion, petition, detention, adjudication, and disposition decisions. Analyses show that black, Latino, and American Indian youth were treated more severely in juvenile court outcomes than their white counterparts. Also, youth who were detained preadjudication were more likely to have a petition filed, less likely to have petitions dismissed, and more likely to be removed from the home at disposition. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022427810365905

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disparities accumulate throughout the juvenile justice process, indicating that larger levels of inequality are seen as an individual moves through the system.

    “Disparities accumulate throughout the juvenile justice process indicating that larger levels of inequality are seen as an individual moves through the system (Rodriguez, 2010).”

    From Adult Outcomes of Justice Involved Indigenous Youth (2023) · cites this paper as Rodriguez, 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodriguez, N.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rodriguez, Nancy
Venue
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
Published
2010-05-11
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
391-413
ISSN
  • 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-731X
OpenAlex
W2148291003
Cited by
257
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
23.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Justice
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
race and ethnicity, racial disparities, juvenile diversion, juvenile adjudication, Black youth, Latino youth, Native American youth, Arizona

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review