The Cumulative Effect of Race and Ethnicity in Juvenile Court Outcomes and Why Preadjudication Detention Matters
Abstract
Despite federal and state legislation aimed at producing equitable treatment of youth in the juvenile court system, studies continue to find that race and ethnicity play a significant role in juvenile court outcomes. To date, few studies have examined the cumulative effects of race and ethnicity in juvenile court outcomes. In this study, a random sample of youth processed in Arizona during 2000 (N = 23,156) was used to examine how race and ethnicity influence diversion, petition, detention, adjudication, and disposition decisions. Analyses show that black, Latino, and American Indian youth were treated more severely in juvenile court outcomes than their white counterparts. Also, youth who were detained preadjudication were more likely to have a petition filed, less likely to have petitions dismissed, and more likely to be removed from the home at disposition. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Disparities accumulate throughout the juvenile justice process, indicating that larger levels of inequality are seen as an individual moves through the system.
“Disparities accumulate throughout the juvenile justice process indicating that larger levels of inequality are seen as an individual moves through the system (Rodriguez, 2010).”
From Adult Outcomes of Justice Involved Indigenous Youth (2023) · cites this paper as Rodriguez, 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sittner, K. J., & Gentzler, K. C. (2016) · Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology · doi:10.1007/s40865-016-0045-2 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Adult Outcomes of Justice Involved Indigenous Youth
Sittner, K. J., & Estes, M. L. (2023) · Race and Justice · doi:10.1177/2153368720973442 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rodriguez, N.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rodriguez, Nancy
- ORCID
- Rodriguez, Nancy
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-05-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 391-413
- ISSN
- 0022-4278 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-731X
- OpenAlex
- W2148291003
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 23.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
- Keywords
- race and ethnicity, racial disparities, juvenile diversion, juvenile adjudication, Black youth, Latino youth, Native American youth, Arizona
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review