Cited by 158Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesGlobal Education and MulticulturalismCritical Race Theory in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Promoting Educators’ Use of Culturally Responsive Practices: A Systematic Review of Inservice Interventions

Abstract

Few educators are well-equipped to bridge cultural differences to ensure that all students have opportunities to learn and succeed. Existing frameworks for culturally responsive practices (CRP) suggest its potential for promoting equitable learning environments, yet the state of the science has not been assessed. This systematic review aimed to (a) describe the features of empirically examined inservice CRP interventions, (b) analyze the quality of the empirical studies, and (c) characterize study measures, outcomes, and conclusions regarding intervention impact. We found a total of just 10 empirical studies of the impact of CRP inservice training models (two quantitative and eight qualitative). Study methods universally failed to meet standards of evidence for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination; none employed rigorous design features to allow causal inference. Findings suggest that the research base is inadequate to draw conclusions regarding effectiveness and that more rigorous CRP inservice intervention research is needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0022487117722553

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Au K., 2009, Social Education, 73, 179
  2. Auerbach S., 2009, School Community Journal, 19, 9
  3. Bickman L., 2009, Journal of Research in Character Education, 7, 75
  4. Bottiani J. H., 2012, Insights on Learning Disabilities, 9, 93
  5. Cazden C., 1981, Culture and the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography, 69
  6. 10.1037//0022-0167.47.2.155 · DOI
  7. Erickson F., 1982, Doing the ethnography of schooling, 131
  8. Gay G., 1995, Multicultural Education: Strategies for Implementation in Colleges and Universities, 4, 95
  9. Granello D. H., 1998, Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 42, 2
  10. Ladson-Billings G., 1994, The dreamkeepers: Successful teaching for African-American students
  11. *Shriberg D., 2012, Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 15, 226
  12. 10.1037//0022-0167.45.3.256 · DOI
  13. Sugai G., 2001, Team implementation checklist

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–158 of 158

Metadata

Authors
Bottiani, J. H., Larson, K. E., Debnam, K. J., Bischoff, C. M., & Bradshaw, C. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Bottiani, Jessika H.
Venue
Journal of Teacher Education
Published
2017-08-16
Volume
69
Issue
4
Pages
367-385
ISSN
  • 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7816
OpenAlex
W2749211608
Cited by
158
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
  • Grantee Submission
Funders
Institute of Education Sciences (R324A110107)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
Keywords
culturally responsive practice, continuing teacher education, teacher professional development, culturally responsive teaching, educational equity, intervention effectiveness, research quality, causal inference

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review