Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 319

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Study in Contrast: Sources of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Secondary English

Howey, Kenneth R., Grossman, Pamela L.·1989·Journal of Teacher Education
DOI 10.1177/002248718904000504
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Grossman investigated the influence of subject-specific course- work in the development of pedagogical content knowledge in English through contrasting case studies of six beginning English teachers, only three of whom graduated from teacher education. She describes the differences in the teachers' knowl edge regarding the purposes for teaching secondary English, curricular knowledge, and knowledge of student understand ing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/002248718904000504

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 319

Metadata

Authors
Howey, K. R., & Grossman, P. L.
Venue
Journal of Teacher Education
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1989-09
Volume
40
Issue
5
Pages
24-31
ISSN
  • 0022-4871 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7816
DOI
10.1177/002248718904000504
OpenAlex
W2137620305
Cited by
319
References
2
FWCI
47.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Study in Contrast: Sources of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Secondary English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/002248718904000504
The paper
Howey, K. R., & Grossman, P. L. (1989). A Study in Contrast: Sources of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Secondary English. Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248718904000504

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.