Cited by 522Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesEvaluation of Teaching PracticesEducational Assessment and Improvement

A Primer on Effective Professional Development

Desimone, Laura M.·2011·Phi Delta Kappan

Abstract

Knitting together the qualities of high-quality professional learning and evaluating the results smartly can lead to improved student learning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/003172171109200616

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of in-service teacher education, which involves active learning and reflection, is well established.

    “The importance of in-service teacher education, which involves active learning and reflection, is well established (Desimone, 2011;Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002), yet the initial introduction of new ideas and practices is still presented to teachers using traditional approaches such as the transmission of information and observation of expert teachers with experienced classes.”

    From Values-Based Physical Education and Teacher Education in South Africa (2022) · cites this paper as Desimone, 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desimone, L. M.
Corresponding author
Desimone, Laura M.
Venue
Phi Delta Kappan
Published
2011-03
Volume
92
Issue
6
Pages
68-71
ISSN
  • 0031-7217 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-6487
OpenAlex
W2008085631
Cited by
522
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 7
FWCI
89.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Phi Delta Kappan (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Educational Assessment and Improvement
Keywords
professional development, teacher learning, learning outcomes, teacher professional development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review