Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Simplified and Elaborated Texts on Foreign Language Reading Comprehension

Yano, Yasukata, Long, Michael H., Ross, Steven·1994·Language Learning

Abstract

Linguistic simplification of written texts can increase their comprehensibility for nonnative speakers but reduce their utility for language learning in other ways, for example, through the removal of linguistic items that learners do not know but need to learn. This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that elaborative modification observed in oral foreigner talk discourse, where redundancy and explicitness compensate for unknown linguistic items, offers a potential alternative approach to written text modification. We randomly presented 13 reading passages to 483 Japanese college students in one of three forms: (a) native baseline, (b) simplified, or (c) elaborated. Comprehension, assessed by 30 multiple‐choice test items, was highest among learners reading the simplified version, but not significantly different from those reading the elaborated version. The type of modifications to the texts interacted significantly with the kind of test item used to, assess comprehension—replication, synthesis or inference—suggesting that different kinds of text modification facilitate different levels of comprehension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Anderson R. C., 1988, Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered, 23
  2. Brown R., 1987, A comparison of the comprehensibility of modified and unmodified reading materials for ESL, University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 6, 49
  3. 10.1093/elt/41.2.132 · doi:10.1093/elt/41.2.132
  4. Carrell P. L., 1990, Reading in a foreign language: Research and pedagogy, JALT Journal, 12, 53
  5. 10.1080/00220973.1988.10806468 · doi:10.1080/00220973.1988.10806468
  6. Davison A, 1988, Linguistic complexity and text comprehension: Readability issues reconsidered
  7. Hams D., 1982, Comprehensive English Langwge Test Forms A and B
  8. Lotherington‐Woloszyn H., 1992, Comprehension‐based second language teaching, 451
  9. Lucas M. A., 1991, Systematic grammatical simplification, International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 29, 241
  10. Mannon T., 1986, Teacher talk: A comparison of a teacher's speech to native and non‐native speakers
  11. Oxford R., 1987, Reviews of English language proficiency tests, 21
  12. Parker K., 1987, The effects of linguistic simplifications and elaborative modifications on L2 comprehension, University of Hawaii Working papers in ESL, 6, 107
  13. Shook R., 1977, Discourse structure in reading, TESL Reporter, 10, 1
  14. 10.1017/S0142716400006020 · doi:10.1017/s0142716400006020
  15. Tsang W. K., 1987, Text modifications in ESL reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, Department of English as a Second Language

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S.
Venue
Language Learning
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-06
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
189-219
ISSN
  • 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9922
OpenAlex
W2024771694
Cited by
279
References
28
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Simplified and Elaborated Texts on Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x
The paper
Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S. (1994). The Effects of Simplified and Elaborated Texts on Foreign Language Reading Comprehension. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.