Cited by 197Contemporary Sociological Theory and PracticeConsumer behavior in food and healthEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?

Open access
Evans, David M·2019·The Sociological Review

Abstract

This article considers the relationships between consumption, the environment, and wider sociological endeavour. The current vogue for applying theories of practice to the policy domain of ‘sustainable consumption’ has been generative of conceptual renewal, however the field now sits closer to the applied environmental social sciences than to the sociology of consumption. The analysis proceeds via a close reading of the intellectual currents that have given rise to this situation, and it identifies a number of interrelated issues concerning conceptual slippage and the exclusion of core disciplinary concerns. Accordingly a more suitable definition of consumption is offered, an agenda for re-engaging with foundational approaches to consumer culture is established, and a renewal and reorientation of critique is proposed. Working through and building on the contributions of practice theoretical repertoires, this article suggests that consumption scholarship offers a distinctive set of resources to discussions of current ecological crises and uncertain social futures. These are briefly described and the conclusion argues that consumption still matters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0038026118764028

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

  • Consumption and Theories of Practice

    Warde, A. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540505053090 · Cited by 2,682 · cited 6× · see citing works

    “It follows that any effort to ground critique in empathetic understandings of environmentally problematic consumption must still acknowledge the capacity for ‘consumers’ to ‘adapt, improvise and experiment’ (Warde 2005: 141), and so consume less.”
    BackgroundInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, D. M.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Evans, David M
Venue
The Sociological Review
Published
2018-03-07
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
499-517
ISSN
  • 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-954X
OpenAlex
W2789873794
Cited by
197
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
35.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
consumption, sociology of consumption, sustainable consumption, practice theory, consumerism, environmental social science, environmental crisis, social futures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review