What is consumption, where has it been going, and does it still matter?
Open accessAbstract
This article considers the relationships between consumption, the environment, and wider sociological endeavour. The current vogue for applying theories of practice to the policy domain of ‘sustainable consumption’ has been generative of conceptual renewal, however the field now sits closer to the applied environmental social sciences than to the sociology of consumption. The analysis proceeds via a close reading of the intellectual currents that have given rise to this situation, and it identifies a number of interrelated issues concerning conceptual slippage and the exclusion of core disciplinary concerns. Accordingly a more suitable definition of consumption is offered, an agenda for re-engaging with foundational approaches to consumer culture is established, and a renewal and reorientation of critique is proposed. Working through and building on the contributions of practice theoretical repertoires, this article suggests that consumption scholarship offers a distinctive set of resources to discussions of current ecological crises and uncertain social futures. These are briefly described and the conclusion argues that consumption still matters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The capacity for intergenerational transference of (un)sustainable food choices is less well studied, both in primary and secondary socialisation contexts.
“The capacity for intergenerational transference of (un)sustainable food choices is also less well studied (Evans, 2019), both in the context of primary (mainly in childhood) and secondary (mainly in adulthood) socialisation (Watne et al., 2011).”
From 'I'd never cook it now': an exploration of intergenerational transference and its role in facilitating family food sustainability (2023) · cites this paper as Evans, 2019
Cites
Consumption and Theories of Practice
Warde, A. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Culture · doi:10.1177/1469540505053090 · Cited by 2,682 · cited 6× · see citing works
“It follows that any effort to ground critique in empathetic understandings of environmentally problematic consumption must still acknowledge the capacity for ‘consumers’ to ‘adapt, improvise and experiment’ (Warde 2005: 141), and so consume less.”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Carrigan, M., Wells, V., & Athwal, N. (2023) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/ejm-10-2021-0804 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Evans, D. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Evans, David M
- ORCID
- Evans, David M
- Venue
- The Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03-07
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-517
- ISSN
- 0038-0261 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-954X
- OpenAlex
- W2789873794
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 35.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- The Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer behavior in food and health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- consumption, sociology of consumption, sustainable consumption, practice theory, consumerism, environmental social science, environmental crisis, social futures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review