The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Looking for the Good Soldier, Švejk: Alternative Modalities of Resistance in the Contemporary Workplace
Abstract
This article continues the current trend in Sociology of exploring and re-evaluating concepts of workplace resistance. We agree with Thompson and Ackroyd (1995) that much of the critical literature investigating managerial controls like self-regulating teams and corporate culture management have placed far too much emphasis on ideological incorporation and ‘colonization’ of subjectivity and not enough on employee recalcitrance and resistance. Rather than hastily blaming the ‘Foucauldian turn’ for this oversight, however, we argue instead that resistance is indeed difficult to see if thought of in purely traditional terms (e.g. strikes, sabotage, picketing). In the age of team normalization and ‘cultural cleansing’ we must look in less obvious places to see practices of dissent. Our article introduces the concept of ‘švejkism’, after the character in Jaroslav Hašek’s novel, The Good Soldier, Švejk. Švejkism is presented as an example of a modality of employee opposition that may have been missed in earlier evaluations of new work forms. We discuss the practice of švejkism and the implications it has for contemporary workplace politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Cited by
Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003) · Organization · doi:10.1177/1350508403010001376 · Cited by 835
Self-citationStakeholder Multiplicity: Toward an Understanding of the Interactions between Stakeholders
Neville, B. A., & Menguc, B. (2006) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-006-0015-4 · Cited by 379
Decaf Resistance: On Misbehavior, Cynicism, and Desire in Liberal Workplaces
Contu, A. (2008) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318907310941 · Cited by 335
Costas, J., & Grey, C. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502768 · Cited by 117
Conspicuous practice: self-surveillance and commodification in English education
Page, D. (2018) · International Studies in Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/09620214.2017.1351309 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleming, P., & Sewell, G.
- Venue
- Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 857-873
- ISSN
- 0038-0385 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8684
- OpenAlex
- W1966188492
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.