Cited by 27Health disparities and outcomesYouth Education and Societal DynamicsEmployment and Welfare Studies

The socioeconomic consequences of loneliness: Evidence from a nationally representative longitudinal study of young adults

Open access
Bryan, Bridget T., Thompson, Katherine N., Goldman-Mellor, Sidra, Moffitt, Terrie E., Odgers, Candice L., So, Sincere Long Shin, Uddin Rahman, Momtahena, Wertz, Jasmin +2 more·2024·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The negative health consequences of loneliness have led to increasing concern about the economic cost of loneliness in recent years. Loneliness may also incur an economic burden more directly, by impacting socioeconomic position. Much of the research to date has focused on employment status which may not fully capture socioeconomic position and has relied on cross-sectional data, leaving questions around the robustness of the association and reverse causation. The present study used longitudinal data to test prospective associations between loneliness and multiple indicators of social position in young adulthood, specifically, whether participants who were lonelier at age 12 were more likely to be out of employment, education and training (NEET) and lower on employability and subjective social status as young adults. The data were drawn from the Environmental Risk (E-Risk) Longitudinal Twin Study, a birth cohort of 2,232 individuals born in England and Wales during 1994-1995. Loneliness and subjective social status were measured at ages 12, 18 and 26. Employability and NEET status were assessed at age 18. Findings indicate that greater loneliness at age 12 was prospectively associated with reduced employability and lower social status in young adulthood. The association between loneliness and lower social status in young adulthood was robust when controlling for a range of confounders using a sibling-control design. Results also indicate that loneliness is unidirectionally associated with reduced subjective social status across adolescence and young adulthood. Overall, our findings suggest that loneliness may have direct costs to the economy resulting from reduced employability and social position, underlining the importance of addressing loneliness early in life.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116697

Cites

54 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These items have also been used to assess loneliness and social isolation in several previous studies in this cohort, supporting the comparison of the present findings to earlier work.

    “These items have also been used to assess loneliness and social isolation in several previous studies in this cohort (e.g.Bryan et al., 2024;Matthews et al., 2022;Thompson et al., 2023), supporting the comparison of the present findings to earlier work”

    From Investigating the interplay of loneliness and social isolation across adolescence: Findings from a nationally representative longitudinal study (2026) · cites this paper as Bryan et al., 2024

    The Method > Measures passage (page not supplied) confirms that Bryan et al. used four UCLA Loneliness Scale items to assess loneliness in the cohort at ages 18 and 26. It does not show those items being used to assess social isolation as a separate measure, so that part of the attribution is unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the US Surgeon General Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: the U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community 2023 hhs.gov/sites/default/files/surgeon-general-social-connection-advisory.pdf 37792968
  2. Widaman K.F. Best practices in quantitative methods for developmentalists: III. Missing data: what to do with or without them Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 71 2006 42 64 17199773

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryan, B. T., Thompson, K. N., Goldman-Mellor, S., Moffitt, T. E., Odgers, C. L., So, S. L. S., Uddin Rahman, M., Wertz, J., Matthews, T., & Arseneault, L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
Corresponding author
Arseneault, Louise
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
345
Pages
116697
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392059283
Cited by
27
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 2
FWCI
12.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
UKRI Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Youth Education and Societal Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
loneliness, socioeconomic position, subjective social status, employability, NEET status, unemployment, young adults, adolescence, Environmental Risk Longitudinal Twin Study, early intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review