The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Capital and the Diffusion of Innovations Within Organizations: The Case of Computer Technology in Schools
Abstract
Although the educational community has learned much about better educational practices, less is known about processes for implementing new practices. The standard model of diffusion suggests that people change perceptions about the value of an innovation through communication, and these perceptions then drive implementation. But implementation can be affected by more instrumental forces. In particular, members of a school share the common fate of the organization and affiliate with the common social system of the organization. Thus, they are more able to gain access to each others' expertise informally and are more likely to respond to social pressure to implement an innovation, regardless of their own perceptions of the value of the innovation. This article characterizes informal access to expertise and responses to social pressure as manifestations of social capital. Using longitudinal and network data in a study of the implementation of computer technology in six schools, the authors found that the effects of perceived social pressure and access to expertise through help and talk were at least as important as the effects of traditional constructs. By implication, change agents should attend to local social capital processes that are related to the implementation of educational innovations or reforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Putnam, R. (2000) · doi:10.1145/358916.361990 · Cited by 17,114
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology
Portes, A. (1998) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1 · Cited by 12,037 · cited 4×
“The result is that social capital has become one of the most ambiguous terms in the social sciences (Portes 1998) and may lose any distinctive meaning (Hirsh and Levin 1999).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialIn search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Embeddedness and Immigration: Notes on the Social Determinants of Economic Action
Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230191 · Cited by 3,493
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change
Coburn, C. E. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032006003 · Cited by 1,030 · cited 1×
“This is just one example of how innovations cannot simply be scaled up and out (Coburn 2003) because implementation depends on the distribution of social capital.”
BackgroundFactors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040004807 · Cited by 947
Self-citationUmbrella Advocates Versus Validity Police: A Life-Cycle Model
Hirsch, P. M., & Levin, D. Z. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.2.199 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Factors Affecting Technology Uses in Schools: An Ecological Perspective
Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040004807 · Cited by 947
Self-citationJacobson, M. J., & Wilensky, U. (2006) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4 · Cited by 679
Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a multilevel path analysis model
Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9487-9 · Cited by 116
Moolenaar, N. M., Daly, A. J., Cornelissen, F., Liou, Y.-H., Caillier, S., Riordan, R., Wilson, K., & Cohen, N. A. (2014) · Journal of Educational Change · doi:10.1007/s10833-014-9230-4 · Cited by 106
Demir, E. K. (2021) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100391 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K.
- Venue
- Sociology of Education
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 148-171
- ISSN
- 0038-0407 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8573
- OpenAlex
- W2163568168
- Cited by
- 556
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 37.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.