Cited by 62Educational Assessment and PedagogyBehavioral and Psychological StudiesInnovative Teaching Methods

Backward Design: Targeting Depth of Understanding for All Learners

Childre, Amy, Sands, Jennifer R., Pope, Saundra Tanner·2009·TEACHING Exceptional Children

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/004005990904100501

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Backward design can be used to develop courses with finely grained coherent learning contents.

    “The technique of backward design,12 in which course instructors decide objectives, determine evaluation criteria and then choose learning activities, can be used to develop courses with finely grained coherent learning contents.”

    From Towards AI-Powered Personalization in MOOC Learning (2017) · cites this paper as [12]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Childre, A., Sands, J. R., & Pope, S. T.
Corresponding author
  • Childre, Amy
  • Sands, Jennifer R.
  • Pope, Saundra Tanner
Venue
TEACHING Exceptional Children
Published
2009-05
Volume
41
Issue
5
Pages
6-14
ISSN
  • 0040-0599 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-5684
OpenAlex
W149733330
Cited by
62
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching Exceptional Children (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Teaching Methods
Keywords
backward design, curriculum development, instructional planning, special education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review