The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Appraisal Determinants of Tourist Emotional Responses
Abstract
A coherent body of research recognizes the role of emotion in various aspects of consumer behavior. However, while a number of studies exist on the consequences of emotion, empirical investigations into its determinants in tourism have received lesser attention. Building on well-established cognitive appraisal theories of emotion, this study investigates the antecedents of tourists’ emotional responses toward destinations. Canonical correlation analysis supports an appraisal model of emotion in the context of tourist destinations. Results indicate that appraisals of pleasantness, goal congruence, and internal self-compatibility are the main determinants of joy, love, and positive surprise. Overall, the findings offer strategic marketing implications for tourist destinations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Lazarus, R. S. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195069945.001.0001 · Cited by 12,691
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150783 · Cited by 12,222
Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys
Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377701400320 · Cited by 10,390
Mail and internet surveys : the tailored design method
Dillman, D. A. (2007) · Cited by 9,587
(1974) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,295
Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect.
Higgins, E. T. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319 · Cited by 7,219
The Cognitive Structure of Emotions
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511571299 · Cited by 6,208
Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions
Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298204600314 · Cited by 5,616
Handbook of Affective Sciences
(2002) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195126013.001.0001 · Cited by 5,073
Cited by
Prayag, G., Hosany, S., Muskat, B., & Del Chiappa, G. (2017) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287515620567 · Cited by 924
Self-citationMeasuring Emotions in Real Time: Implications for Tourism Experience Design
Kim, J. (., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2015) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/0047287514550100 · Cited by 335
Delighted or Satisfied? Positive Emotional Responses Derived from Theme Park Experiences
Ma, J., Scott, N., Gao, J., & Ding, P. (2017) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2015.1125824 · Cited by 138
The Experience of Novelty and the Novelty of Experience
Skavronskaya, L., Moyle, B., & Scott, N. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00322 · Cited by 103
“This finding is consistent with the previous tourism literature on role of emotions and goals in cognitive appraisal process in tourism (Hosany, 2012; Ma et al., 2017; Campos et al., 2018).”
BackgroundMethodResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Hosany, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Travel Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-05-30
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 303-314
- ISSN
- 0047-2875 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-6763
- OpenAlex
- W2065118479
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 127
- FWCI
- 24.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Appraisal Determinants of Tourist Emotional Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0047287511410320
- The paper
- Hosany, S. (2012). Appraisal Determinants of Tourist Emotional Responses. Journal of Travel Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511410320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
