Cited by 103Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementNostalgia and Consumer Behavior

The Experience of Novelty and the Novelty of Experience

Open access
Skavronskaya, Liubov, Moyle, Brent, Scott, Noel·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In cognitive psychology novelty is an antecedent of attention, emotion, memory, and behavior. However, the relationship between novelty and experience memorability remains conceptually underdeveloped in tourism. This research applies cognitive appraisal theory (CAT) to explore the contribution of novelty and emotion to memorable tourism experiences (MTEs). Seventy-five novel travel episodes were identified through semi-structured interviews. Analysis focused on the antecedent and consequent conditions of novelty. Novel experiences, whether positive or negative, were identified as critical to experience memorability. Novelty could be segmented into trip-related and event-related dimensions. Novelty contributes to how spatial, temporal, and contextual details of tourism experiences are remembered and reconstructed due to the elicitation of intense emotions. Analysis revealed negative experiences deemed as novel were found to be re-evaluated and often remembered as a positive experience. A conceptual model titled "cognitive appraisal of novelty in memorable tourism experiences" is presented for consideration in future research. By applying a retrospective and prospective approach the conceptual model explores the role of novelty through the process of cognitive appraisal, identifying goals, attention, and prior experiences as central for the experience of novelty. Future research should consider the application of recent advance in CAT to advance inquiry on tourism experiences as a psychological phenomenon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00322

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Communities have made locally prolific melanistic squirrels into tourist attractions and they have become an important source of revenue.

    “Capitalizing on the idea of rarity associated with these traits, communities have made these locally prolific melanistic squirrels into tourist attractions and they have become an important source of revenue (Skavronskaya et al., 2020a, b).”

    From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Skavronskaya et al., 2020a, b

    The Defining Novelty and Conclusion sections discuss novelty in tourism generally, but neither addresses melanistic squirrels, community attractions, or revenue. Searches for melanistic squirrels and squirrel-related tourism revenue found no relevant passage in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 136 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Hall M. (2004). Reflexivity and tourism research, in Qualitative Research in Tourism: Ontologies, Epistemologies and Methodologies, eds Goodson L. Phillimore J. (London: Routledge), 137– 155.
  2. Mak A. H. (2015). Novelty, tourism, in Encyclopedia of Tourism, eds Jafari J. Xiao H. (London: Routledge), 319 10.1007/978-3-319-01669-6_460-1 · DOI
  3. Mandler G. (1997). Human Nature Explored. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  4. Neisser U. (1967). Cognitive Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skavronskaya, L., Moyle, B., & Scott, N.
Affiliations
  • University of the Sunshine Coast (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Skavronskaya, Liubov
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-02-26
Volume
11
Pages
322-322
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3008047622
Cited by
103
References
136
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Keywords
novelty, memorable tourism experience, appraisal theory, emotions, memory reconstruction, conceptual model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review