Cited by 363Human Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingSurvey Methodology and Nonresponse

Smartphones: An emerging tool for social scientists

Raento, Mika, Oulasvirta, Antti, Eagle, Nathan·2009·Sociological Methods & Research

Abstract

Recent developments in mobile technologies have produced a new kind of device: a programmable mobile phone, the smartphone. In this article, the authors argue that the technological and social characteristics of this device make it a useful tool in social sciences, particularly sociology, social psychology, urban studies, technology assessment, and media studies. The device is willingly carried by a large fraction of people in developed countries, integrates a number of technologies for automatic observation, can be programmed to interact with the user, and can communicate with remote researchers. This allows unobtrusive and cost-effective access to previously inaccessible sources of data on everyday social behavior, such as physical proximity of people, phone calls, and patterns of movement. The authors describe three studies in human behavior that have augmented existing methods with the smartphone, two of which the authors conducted themselves. Based on their experience, the authors critically evaluate the improvements and threats to validity and reliability of smartphone-augmented methods. These approaches are rapidly becoming feasible for the social scientist, since research software for smartphones have been published in open source, which lowers the technical and economic investment needed for their utilization in research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0049124108330005

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raento, M., Oulasvirta, A., & Eagle, N.
Affiliations
  • Google (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (FI)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Sociological Methods & Research
Published
2009-02
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
426-454
ISSN
  • 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8294
OpenAlex
W2157436967
Cited by
363
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
51.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociological Methods & Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Keywords
smartphones, unobtrusive data collection, physical proximity, movement patterns, reliability and validity, open-source research software, sociology of technology, social psychology, urban studies, technology assessment, media studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review