Cited by 135Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyMedia and Digital Communication

A week without using social media: results from an ecological momentary intervention study using smartphones

Stieger, Stefan, Lewetz, David·2018·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Abstract

Online social media is now omnipresent in many people's daily lives. Much research has been conducted on how and why we use social media, but little is known about the impact of social media abstinence. Therefore, we designed an ecological momentary intervention study using smartphones. Participants were instructed not to use social media for 7 days (4 days baseline, 7 days intervention, and 4 days postintervention; N = 152). We assessed affect (positive and negative), boredom, and craving thrice a day (time-contingent sampling), as well as social media usage frequency, usage duration, and social pressure to be on social media at the end of each day (7,000+ single assessments). We found withdrawal symptoms, such as significantly heightened craving (β = 0.10) and boredom (β = 0.12), as well as reduced positive and negative affect (only descriptively). Social pressure to be on social media was significantly heightened during social media abstinence (β = 0.19) and a substantial number of participants (59 percent) relapsed at least once during the intervention phase. We could not find any substantial rebound effect after the end of the intervention. Taken together, communicating through online social media is evidently such an integral part of everyday life that being without it leads to withdrawal symptoms (craving, boredom), relapses, and social pressure to get back on social media.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2018.0070

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hall et al. found that social media abstention did not account for changes in loneliness or subjective well-being.

    “For instance, Hall et al. (40) manipulated social media use by randomly assigning undergraduates to varying durations of abstinence (0, 2, 3, and 4 weeks) and found that social media abstention did not account for changes in loneliness or subjective well-being [see (41) for similar finding].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stieger, S., & Lewetz, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Stieger, Stefan
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2018-10
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
618-624
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2898050449
Cited by
135
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 9
FWCI
37.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social media withdrawal, craving, boredom, positive and negative affect, social pressure, relapse, rebound effect, smartphone-based intervention, ecological momentary assessment, social media use
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult, Social Media, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review