Cited by 86Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health via Writing

Digital phenotyping in psychological and medical sciences: a reflection about necessary prerequisites to reduce harm and increase benefits

Montag, Christian, Sindermann, Cornelia, Baumeister, Harald·2020·Current Opinion in Psychology

Abstract

Digital phenotyping represents a new powerful tool to implement psychodiagnostics in many areas of psychology and medicine. The basic idea behind digital phenotyping is that digital footprints of a person left on social media, smartphones, or other sources of the Internet of Things can be used to get fine grained insights into psychological trait and state variables. Although digital phenotyping has tremendous potential to shed new light on human nature, it naturally comes with risks in the domains of privacy. Therefore, the present article reflects on necessary prerequisites on societal, scientific, and individual level to reduce harm and increase benefits of digital phenotyping.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.013

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montag, C., Sindermann, C., & Baumeister, H.
Affiliations
Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Montag, Christian
Venue
Current Opinion in Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
36
Pages
19-24
ISSN
2352-250X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016227911
Cited by
86
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Universität Ulm
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
digital phenotyping, digital footprint, psychodiagnosis, psychological characteristics, psychological state, social media, smartphones, Internet of Things, privacy, ethical considerations, benefits and harms
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Humans, Phenotype, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review