The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods: Examples and Ideas
Abstract
Bootstrap methods are a collection of sample re-use techniques designed to estimate standard errors and confidence intervals. Making use of numerous samples drawn from the initial observations, these techniques require fewer assumptions and offer greater accuracy and insight than do standard methods in many problems. After presenting the underlying concepts, this introduction focuses on applications in regression analysis. These applications contrast two forms of bootstrap resampling in regression, illustrating their differences in a series of examples that include outliers and heteroscedasticity. Other regression examples use the bootstrap to estimate standard errors of robust estimators in regression and indirect effects in path models. Numerous variations of bootstrap confidence intervals exist, and examples stress the concepts that are common to the various approaches. Suggestions for computing bootstrap estimates appear throughout the discussion, and a section on computing suggests several broad guidelines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Resampling Plans
Efron, B. (1982) · Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics eBooks · doi:10.1137/1.9781611970319 · Cited by 8,120
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1986) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013815 · Cited by 6,033
A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation
Efron, B., & Gong, G. (1983) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.1983.10483087 · Cited by 3,229
Some aspects of the spline smoothing approach to non-parametric regression curve fitting
Silverman, B. W. (1985) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1985.tb01327.x · Cited by 1,117
Cited by
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions
Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273170701341316 · Cited by 9,973
Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.1.1 · Cited by 4,711
Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects
Preacher, K. J., & Selig, J. P. (2012) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2012.679848 · Cited by 1,908
Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002004 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- STINE, R.
- Venue
- Sociological Methods & Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1989-11
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 243-291
- ISSN
- 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8294
- OpenAlex
- W2050059289
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods: Examples and Ideas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0049124189018002003
- The paper
- STINE, R. (1989). An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods: Examples and Ideas. Sociological Methods & Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124189018002003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.