Cited by 1,831Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Bootstrapping goodness-of-fit measures in structural equation models.

Bollen, Kenneth A., Stine, Robert A.·1992·Sociological Methods & Research

Abstract

Assessing overall fit is a topic of keen interest to structural equation modelers, yet measuring goodness of fit has been hampered by several factors. First, the assumptions that underlie the chi-square tests of model fit often are violated. Second, many fit measures (e.g., Bentler and Bonett's [1980] normed fit index) have unknown statistical distributions so that hypothesis testing, confidence intervals, or comparisons of significant differences in these fit indices are not possible. Finally, modelers have little knowledge about the distribution and behavior of the fit measures for misspecified models or for nonnested models. Given this situation, bootstrapping techniques would appear to be an ideal means to tackle these problems. Indeed, Bentler's (1989) EQS 3.0 and Jöreskog and Sörbom's (forthcoming) LISREL 8 have bootstrap resampling options to bootstrap fit indices. In this article the authors (a) demonstrate that the usual bootstrapping methods will fail when applied to the original data, (b) explain why this occurs, and, (c) propose a modified bootstrap method for the chi-square test statistic for model fit. They include simulated and empirical examples to illustrate their results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0049124192021002004

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Sociological Methods & Research
Published
1992-11
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
205-229
ISSN
  • 0049-1241 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8294
OpenAlex
W2030630447
Cited by
1,831
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 124 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 114 · 2022: 143 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 87 · 2013: 72 · 2012: 72
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociological Methods & Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
structural equation modeling, goodness-of-fit measures, bootstrapping, model misspecification, EQS, LISREL

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review