CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 8Health and Wellbeing ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The factor structure of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II among a South African student sample

Roomaney, Rizwana, van Eeden, Sarah, Kagee, Ashraf·2017·South African Journal of Psychology
DOI 10.1177/0081246316667919
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the factor structure of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II scale in a South African sample. The sample consisted of 211 students at a university. Students completed an online survey that included the 52-item Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. Confirmatory factor analysis, items analysis, and exploratory factor analysis were used to determine the factor structure of the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II and reduce the number of items. Confirmatory factor analysis did not confirm the original six-factor structure for the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. The measure produced high internal consistency value (Cronbach’s alpha = .92) indicating over-redundancy of items. Item analysis was conducted in order to reduce the number of items. A subsequent exploratory factor analysis yielded a six-factor model for the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II in the current sample. The final 24-item measure demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = .87) and can be used as an alternative to the original measure within the current sample.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0081246316667919

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Boland C. S., 2000, Journal of Multicultural Nursing and Health, 6, 12
  2. Chester D. N., 2006, Journal of National Black Nurses Association, 17, 1
  3. Travis J. W., 1977, Wellness workbook for health professionals

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Roomaney, R., van Eeden, S., & Kagee, A.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • Department of Psychology, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
Corresponding author
Roomaney, Rizwana
ORCID
Venue
South African Journal of Psychology
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2016-09-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
389-400
ISSN
0081-2463 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/0081246316667919
OpenAlex
W2510008416
Cited by
8
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
South African Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile II, factor structure, health-promoting lifestyle, scale validation, item reduction, university students, South African students, psychometric properties

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review