The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy
Open accessAbstract
Deliberative democracy is usually presented as a polity in which legitimacy is achieved by deliberative participation on the part of those subject to a collective decision. But cast in these terms, the theory runs headlong into the long-recognized impossibility of directly involving more than a few members of any large-scale democracy in decision making. After canvassing the available solutions to this problem, an argument is made for conceptualizing deliberative democracy in terms of the contestation of discourses in the public sphere, and public opinion as the provisional outcome of this contestation as transmitted to the state. Legitimacy is then achieved to the degree collective outcomes respond to the balance of discourses in the polity, to the extent this balance is itself subject to dispersed and competent political control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-4175 · Cited by 12,693
Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy
Habermas, J. (1996) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001 · Cited by 9,998
The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process
Hajer, M. A. (1997) · doi:10.1093/019829333x.001.0001 · Cited by 4,184
Reflexive modernization: politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-6488 · Cited by 2,870
Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-5835 · Cited by 2,710
The field of Cultural Production
(2002) · Understanding Bourdieu · doi:10.4135/9781446221488.n8 · Cited by 2,461
Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations
Dryzek, J. S. (2002) · doi:10.1093/019925043x.001.0001 · Cited by 1,728
Self-citation(1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,583
Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-6564 · Cited by 1,497
Identity/difference: democratic negotiations of political paradox
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-1764 · Cited by 1,319
Cited by
Deliberative Democracy in Divided Societies: Alternatives to Agonism and Analgesia
Dryzek, J. S. (2005) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/0090591704268372 · Cited by 447
Self-citationBiermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., Bulkeley, H., Cashore, B., Clapp, J., Folke, C., et al. (2012) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.014 · Cited by 256
Organizing consent: The role of procedural fairness in political trust and compliance
Grimes, M. (2006) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00299.x · Cited by 224
Behagel, J., & Turnhout, E. (2011) · Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning · doi:10.1080/1523908x.2011.607002 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- DRYZEK, J. S.
- Venue
- Political Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 651-669
- ISSN
- 0090-5917 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7476
- OpenAlex
- W2004084122
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 57.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0090591701029005003
- The paper
- DRYZEK, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.