Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New Era in Drug Interaction Evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration Update on CYP Enzymes, Transporters, and the Guidance Process

Huang, Shiew‐Mei, Strong, John M., Zhang, Lei, Reynolds, Kellie S., Nallani, Srikanth, Temple, Robert, Abraham, Sophia, Habet, Sayed Al, Baweja, Raman K., Burckart, Gilbert J., Chung, Sang, Colangelo, Philip, Frucht, David, Green, Martin D., Hepp, Paul, Karnaukhova, Elena, Ko, Hon‐Sum, Lee, Jang‐Ik, Marroum, Patrick J., Norden, Janet M., Qiu, Wei, Rahman, Atiqur, Sobel, Solomon, Stifano, Toni, Thummel, Kenneth, Wei, Xiao‐Xiong, Yasuda, Sally, Zheng, Jenny H., Zhao, Hong, Lesko, Lawrence J.·2008·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Predicting clinically significant drug interactions during drug development is a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies. Since the publication of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) first in vitro and in vivo drug interaction guidance documents in 1997 and 1999, researchers and clinicians have gained a better understanding of drug interactions. This knowledge has enabled the FDA and the industry to progress and begin to overcome these challenges. The FDA has continued its efforts to evaluate methodologies to study drug interactions and communicate recommendations regarding the conduct of drug interaction studies, particularly for CYP‐based and transporter‐based drug interactions, to the pharmaceutical industry. A drug interaction Web site was established to document the FDA's current understanding of drug interactions (http:www.fda.govcderdrugdrugInteractionsdefault.htm). This report provides an overview of the evolution of the drug interaction guidances, includes a synopsis of the steps taken by the FDA to revise the original drug interaction guidance documents, and summarizes and highlights updated sections in the current guidance document, Drug Interaction Studies—Study Design, Data Analysis, and Implications for Dosing and Labeling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091270007312153

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Huang, S., Strong, J. M., Zhang, L., Reynolds, K. S., Nallani, S., Temple, R., Abraham, S., Habet, S. A., Baweja, R. K., Burckart, G. J., Chung, S., Colangelo, P., Frucht, D., Green, M. D., Hepp, P., Karnaukhova, E., Ko, H., Lee, J., Marroum, P. J., Norden, J. M., Qiu, W., Rahman, A., Sobel, S., Stifano, T., Thummel, K., Wei, X., Yasuda, S., Zheng, J. H., Zhao, H., & Lesko, L. J.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
662-670
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W2158425599
Cited by
396
References
1
FWCI
24.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New Era in Drug Interaction Evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration Update on CYP Enzymes, Transporters, and the Guidance Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0091270007312153
The paper
Huang, S., Strong, J. M., Zhang, L., Reynolds, K. S., Nallani, S., Temple, R., Abraham, S., Habet, S. A., Baweja, R. K., Burckart, G. J., Chung, S., Colangelo, P., Frucht, D., Green, M. D., Hepp, P., Karnaukhova, E., Ko, H., Lee, J., Marroum, P. J., . . . Lesko, L. J. (2008). New Era in Drug Interaction Evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration Update on CYP Enzymes, Transporters, and the Guidance Process. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091270007312153

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.