The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New Era in Drug Interaction Evaluation: US Food and Drug Administration Update on CYP Enzymes, Transporters, and the Guidance Process
Abstract
Predicting clinically significant drug interactions during drug development is a challenge for the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies. Since the publication of the US Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) first in vitro and in vivo drug interaction guidance documents in 1997 and 1999, researchers and clinicians have gained a better understanding of drug interactions. This knowledge has enabled the FDA and the industry to progress and begin to overcome these challenges. The FDA has continued its efforts to evaluate methodologies to study drug interactions and communicate recommendations regarding the conduct of drug interaction studies, particularly for CYP‐based and transporter‐based drug interactions, to the pharmaceutical industry. A drug interaction Web site was established to document the FDA's current understanding of drug interactions (http:www.fda.govcderdrugdrugInteractionsdefault.htm). This report provides an overview of the evolution of the drug interaction guidances, includes a synopsis of the steps taken by the FDA to revise the original drug interaction guidance documents, and summarizes and highlights updated sections in the current guidance document, Drug Interaction Studies—Study Design, Data Analysis, and Implications for Dosing and Labeling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
EVALUATION OF DRUG-DRUG INTERACTION IN THE HEPATOBILIARY AND RENAL TRANSPORT OF DRUGS
Shitara, Y., Sato, H., & Sugiyama, Y. (2005) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.44.101802.121444 · Cited by 336
Cited by
Daina, A., Michielin, O., & Zoete, V. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep42717 · Cited by 18,367
Zanger, U. M., & Schwab, M. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.12.007 · Cited by 4,169
Membrane transporters in drug development
The International Transporter Consortium, Giacomini, K. M., Huang, S.-M., Tweedie, D. J., Benet, L. Z., Brouwer, K. L. R., Chu, X., Dahlin, A., Evers, R., Fischer, V., et al. (2010) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3028 · Cited by 3,340
Self-citationPhysiologically-Based Pharmacokinetics in Drug Development and Regulatory Science
Rowland, M., Peck, C., & Tucker, G. (2011) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-010510-100540 · Cited by 662
Guo, L., Dial, S., Shi, L., Branham, W., Liu, J., Fang, J.-L., Green, B., Deng, H., Kaput, J., & Ning, B. (2011) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.110.035873 · Cited by 348
The Role of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling in Regulatory Review
Huang, S.-M., & Rowland, M. (2012) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1038/clpt.2011.320 · Cited by 150
Drug–Nutrient Interactions: A Broad View with Implications for Practice
Boullata, J. I., & Hudson, L. M. (2012) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2011.09.002 · Cited by 138
Repeated administration of berberine inhibits cytochromes P450 in humans
Guo, Y., Chen, Y., Tan, Z.-R., Klaassen, C. D., & Zhou, H.-H. (2012) · European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00228-011-1108-2 · Cited by 137
Drug interactions evaluation: An integrated part of risk assessment of therapeutics
Zhang, L., Reynolds, K. S., Zhao, P., & Huang, S.-M. (2010) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.016 · Cited by 125
Self-citationXuan, J., Chen, S., Ning, B., Tolleson, W. H., & Guo, L. (2016) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2015.10.009 · Cited by 103
Slizgi, J. R., Lu, Y., Brouwer, K. R., St. Claire, R. L., Freeman, K. M., Pan, M., Brock, W. J., & Brouwer, K. L. R. (2016) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfv231 · Cited by 53
In Vitro Three‐Dimensional Liver Models for Nanomaterial DNA Damage Assessment
Llewellyn, S. V., Niemeijer, M., Nymark, P., Moné, M. J., van de Water, B., Conway, G. E., Jenkins, G. J. S., & Doak, S. H. (2021) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202006055 · Cited by 41
Winter, L., Naumann, F., Olsson, K., Fuge, J., Hoeper, M. M., & Kahl, K. G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00143 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, S., Strong, J. M., Zhang, L., Reynolds, K. S., Nallani, S., Temple, R., Abraham, S., Habet, S. A., Baweja, R. K., Burckart, G. J., Chung, S., Colangelo, P., Frucht, D., Green, M. D., Hepp, P., Karnaukhova, E., Ko, H., Lee, J., Marroum, P. J., Norden, J. M., Qiu, W., Rahman, A., Sobel, S., Stifano, T., Thummel, K., Wei, X., Yasuda, S., Zheng, J. H., Zhao, H., & Lesko, L. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 662-670
- ISSN
- 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
- 0091-2700
- 1552-4604
- OpenAlex
- W2158425599
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
