Cited by 39Migraine and Headache StudiesPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications

Does the Unfavorable Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of the iNOS Inhibitor GW273629 Lead to Inefficacy in Acute Migraine?

Van der Schueren, B. J., Lunnon, M. W., Laurijssens, B. E., Guillard, F., Palmer, J., Van Hecken, A., Depré, M., Vanmolkot, F. H. +1 more·2009·The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of GW273629, a selective iNOS inhibitor, given during and outside a migraine attack. GW273629 1500 mg was administered to 15 migraine patients both ictally and interictally. Nasal and exhaled nitric oxide (NO), plasma 3‐nitrotyrosine, and nitrates were measured to assess systemic NO production. In addition, pharmacokinetics and treatment response were assessed. Data are mean (95% confidence interval [CI]). Plasma 3‐nitrotyrosine was higher ictally: 11.96 (8.22, 15.71) ictally versus 2.74 (2.24, 3.24) ng/10 mg interictally (P< .0001). Exhaled and nasal NO showed a similar trend: 12.5 (6.5, 18.6) and 62.2 (41.5, 82.8) ppb ictally versus 9.9 (6.3, 13.4) ppb and 52.5 (38.5, 66.0) ppb interictally, respectively. Early absorption of GW273629 (AUC 0–2[90% CI]) was reduced by 41 (22, 55)% during an attack. There was no improvement of headache or associated symptoms. Migraine headache is associated with reduced early absorption of GW273629 and excess NO production. In this open‐label study, GW273629 was ineffective in the treatment of acute migraine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091270008329548

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ADMA and NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (but not symmetric dimethylarginine) are NOS inhibitors and can be important regulators of NOS activity in vivo.

    “Notably, ADMA and NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (but not symmetric dimethylarginine) are NOS inhibitors and can be important regulators of NOS activity in vivo (566, 963).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van der Schueren, B. J., Lunnon, M. W., Laurijssens, B. E., Guillard, F., Palmer, J., Van Hecken, A., Depré, M., Vanmolkot, F. H., & de Hoon, J. N.
Affiliations
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
281-290
ISSN
  • 0021-9754 (ISSN-L)
  • 0091-2700
  • 1552-4604
OpenAlex
W2007452676
Cited by
39
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Keywords
iNOS inhibitors, acute migraine, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, nitric oxide, exhaled nitric oxide, nasal nitric oxide, nitrotyrosine, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Male, Migraine Disorders, Nitrates, Nitric Oxide, Sulfones, Tyrosine, Area Under Curve, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review