Cited by 416Higher Education Research StudiesEvasion and Academic Success FactorsEducational Outcomes and Influences

Predictors of First-Year Student Retention in the Community College

Open access
Fike, David S., Fike, Renea·2008·Community College Review

Abstract

This study analyzed predictors of fall-to-spring and fall-to-fall retention for 9,200 first-time-in-college students who enrolled in a community college over a four-year period. Findings highlight the impact of developmental education programs and internet-based courses on student persistence. Additional predictors include financial aid, parents' education, the number of semester hours enrolled in and dropped during the first fall semester, and participation in the Student Support Services program.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0091552108320222

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bean, J. P. (1990). Why students leave: Insights from research. In D. Hossler, J. P. Bean, & Associates (Eds.), The strategic management of college enrollments (pp. 170-185). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  2. Dixon, R. A. (1993, March). Improved reading comprehension: A key to university retention? Paper presented at the Sixth Annual Midwest Regional Reading and Study Skills Conference, Kansas City, MO.
  3. Fike, D. S., & Fike, R. (2007). Does faculty employment status impact developmental mathematics outcomes? Journal of Developmental Education, 31, 2-11.
  4. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes of student attrition (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fike, D. S., & Fike, R.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of the Incarnate Word (US)
Venue
Community College Review
Published
2008-10
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
68-88
ISSN
  • 0091-5521 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-2325
OpenAlex
W2113928737
Cited by
416
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 29
FWCI
52.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Community College Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Evasion and Academic Success Factors
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
Keywords
student retention, first-year students, community colleges, student persistence, remedial education, online courses, financial aid, parental education, student support services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review