Cited by 114Higher Education Research StudiesSocial and Cultural DynamicsSocial Capital and Networks

Social Capital and Academic Motivation Among First-Generation Community College Students

Moschetti, Roxanne Venus, Hudley, Cynthia·2015·Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Abstract

Social capital, the value of a relationship that provides support and assistance in a given social situation (Stanton-Salazar, 2001), is a useful theory for understanding the experiences of low-income adolescents who are the first in their families to attend college. According to social capital theory, networks of relationships can help students manage an unfamiliar environment by providing them with relevant information, guidance, and emotional support. Existing research on social capital in postsecondary institutions has focused on low-income, ethnic minority adolescents, finding that low socioeconomic status (low-SES) and first-generation ethnic minority students struggle in accessing beneficial social capital on campus (Prospero & Vohra-Gupta, 2007; Saunders & Serna, 2004). However, the academic and social adjustment of first-generation, low-income White students is an understudied phenomenon. Therefore, this study examined how White, working-class, first-generation community college students, enrolled at a community college in northern Nevada, managed to integrate themselves, both socially and academically, into college. A grounded theory approach was used to analyze the interview data (Corbin & Strauss, 2008). Overall, first-generation, working-class, White community college students face many obstacles to earning postsecondary degrees, and social capital in the form of relationships with institutional agents on campus may be able to help them further their academic goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10668926.2013.819304

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 77 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moschetti, R. V., & Hudley, C.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Northridge (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Moschetti, Roxanne Venus
Venue
Community College Journal of Research and Practice
Published
2014-08-15
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
235-251
ISSN
  • 1066-8926 (ISSN-L)
  • 1521-0413
OpenAlex
W2045807005
Cited by
114
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
25.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Community College Journal of Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
Keywords
social capital, first-generation college students, community college students, academic motivation, working-class students, social integration, academic adjustment, institutional relations, social networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review