Developing transfer pride: an exploration of critical race pedagogy and the summer transfer enrichment program
Abstract
Objective: This study examined the critical race pedagogy of the Summer Transfer Enrichment Program (STEP) over a 5-year span and how the curriculum and supplemental academic programming aided in the development of a positive transfer identity for its participants. Method: A mixed method convergent parallel design approach was used to collect quantitative and qualitative data in the forms of surveys and focus groups. Fifty-six students, the majority Latinx, responded to the survey along with 22 students in focus groups. Data were analyzed through descriptive statistics and a reiterative thematic coding process. Results: Students shared how their summer courses and additional workshops and speakers reflected critical race pedagogy, how they experienced racial isolation and discrimination once they transferred to a 4-year campus, and ultimately how they built a strong sense of transfer pride. Conclusion: Based on the study’s findings, we encourage universities and colleges to build a more supportive transfer receptive culture that centralizes race and offers critical pedagogical spaces in its outreach efforts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Other positive impacts of pathway programs include improvements to participants' academic and research knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy.
“Other positive impacts of pathway programs include improvements to participants’ academic and research knowledge, skills, and self-efficacy.17,18,19”
From Perceived Success After Participation in the Summer Health Professions Education Program (2024) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Solorzano, D. G. (1998) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education · doi:10.1080/095183998236926 · Cited by 1,132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…education that highlights the permanence of racism and the creation and maintenance of structural inequalities experienced by people of color throughout the educational pipeline (Ladson-Billings, 1998; LadsonBillings & Tate, 1995; Ledesma & Calderón, 2015; Parker & Stovall, 2004; Solorzano, 1998).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Perceived Success After Participation in the Summer Health Professions Education Program
Xirau-Probert, P., Lai, T., Black, E., Fanfan, D., Blue, A., Rush, C. C., Powers, R., & Stacciarini, J.-M. R. (2024) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52440 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jain, D., Lucero, I., Bernal, S., Herrera, A., & Solorzano, D.
- Affiliations
- California State University, Northridge (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Corresponding author
- Jain, Dimpal
- ORCID
- Bernal, Santiago
- Venue
- Community College Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-06-27
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 171-189
- ISSN
- 0091-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1940-2325
- OpenAlex
- W2726764457
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 2.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Community College Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Practises and Engagement
- Keywords
- transfer students, critical race pedagogy, Hispanic students, racial isolation, racial discrimination, university outreach, summer programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review