The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The inclusion rate of 61.3 % was comparable with the rates reported in other meta-analyses in marketing (e.g., Kirca, Jayachandran, and Bearden 2005; Szymanski and Henard 2001).”
From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Szymanski and Henard 2001
Citations
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes
Westbrook, R. A. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400302 · Cited by 2,462
Goodwin, C., & Ross, I. (1992) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(92)90014-3 · Cited by 777
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670502004003006 · Cited by 2,301
Kirca, A. H., Jayachandran, S., & Bearden, W. O. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.2.24.60761 · Cited by 2,182
Consumer Switching Costs: A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequences
Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302250897 · Cited by 1,858
The four levels of loyalty and the pivotal role of trust: a study of online service dynamics
Harris, L. C., & Goode, M. M. H. (2004) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2004.04.002 · Cited by 1,425
Lally, P., & Gardner, B. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.603640 · Cited by 901
Metadata
- Authors
- Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
- Published
- 2001-12-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-35
- ISSN
- 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
- 0000-0000
- OpenAlex
- W2059955887
- Cited by
- 2,002
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 110 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Keywords
- customer satisfaction, equity, disconfirmation, measurement effects, method effects, moderating effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0092070301291002
- The paper
- Szymanski, D. M., & Henard, D. H. (2001). Customer Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070301291002