Cited by 426Business Strategies and Management ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and TestingDiverse Academic Research Areas

The dangers of poor construct conceptualization

MacKenzie, Scott B.·2003·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0092070303031003011

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacKenzie, S. B.
Affiliations
Indiana University (US)
Corresponding author
MacKenzie, Scott B.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2003-06-01
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
323-326
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 0000-0000
OpenAlex
W2021667853
Cited by
426
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 18
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Business Strategies and Management Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Academic Research Areas
Keywords
construct conceptualization, construct validity, statistical conclusion validity, internal validity, generalizability, research validity, manuscript review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review