Cited by 102Media Studies and CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesMedia Influence and Health

Explaining Effects of Sensationalism on Liking of Television News Stories: The Role of Emotional Arousal

Open access
Vettehen, Paul Hendriks, Nuijten, Koos, Peeters, Allerd·2008·Communication Research

Abstract

This study investigates the appeal of sensationalist television news. News stories were content analyzed to measure the presence of sensationalist features. In addition, the stories were watched and evaluated by participants to measure the degree to which the items elicited emotional arousal and the degree to which the items were liked. As predicted, the findings showed that emotional arousal mediates effects of sensationalist features on liking and that the relationship between emotional arousal and liking takes the shape of an inverted U.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093650208315960

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensationalism in journalism is associated with dramatic presentation, emotional appeals, moral polarization, and prioritization of shock or curiosity over proportionality.

    “It has long been associated with dramatic presentation, emotional appeals, moral polarization, and the prioritization of shock or curiosity over proportionality (Molek-Kozakowska, 2013;Vettehen et al., 2008).”

    From Sensational Headlines, Engagement, and Credibility in Nepal’s Online News (2025) · cites this paper as Vettehen et al., 2008

    The Sensationalism section (page unavailable) identifies dramatic subjects and attention-getting audiovisual features, and the Discussion links some of these features to viewers’ emotional arousal. The paper does not characterize sensationalism in terms of moral polarization or prioritizing shock or curiosity over proportionality. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Adams, W. C. (1978). Local public affairs content on TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 690-695.
  2. Bellamy, R. V., & Walker, J. R. (1996). Television and remote control: Grazing on a vast wasteland. New York: Guilford Press.
  3. Bird, E. S. (2000). Audience demands in a murderous market: Tabloidization in U.S. television news. In C. Sparks & J. Tulloch (Eds.), Tabloid tales: Global debates over media standards (pp. 213-228). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
  4. Costera Meijer, I. (2007). The paradox of popularity. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 96-116.
  5. Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S., & Barnett, B. (2001). Explicating sensationalism in television news: Content and the bells and whistles of form. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 635-655.
  6. Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S., Lang, A., & Bolls, P. D. (2000). Packaging television news: The effects of tabloid on information processing and evaluative responses. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 581-598.
  7. Hendriks Vettehen, P. G. J., Nuijten, C. M., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2005). News in an age of competition: Sensationalism in Dutch television news 1995-2001. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 282-295.
  8. Hjarvard, S. (2000). Proximity. The name of the ratings game. Nordicom Review, 21(2), 63-81.
  9. Holbert, R. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2003). The importance of indirect effects in media effects research: Testing for mediation in structural equation modeling. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 47, 556-572.
  10. Hopkins, R., & Fletcher, J. E. (1994). Electrodermal measurement: Particularly effective for forecasting message influence on sales appeal. In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 113-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  11. Hvitfelt, H. (1994). The commercialization of the evening news: Changes in narrative technique in Swedish TV news. Nordicom Review, 15(1), 33-41.
  12. Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57-S80.
  13. Lang, A., Bolls, P. D., Potter, R., & Kawahara, K. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 451-457.
  14. Lang, A., Shin, M., Bradley, S. D., Wang, Z., Lee, S., & Potter, D. (2005). Wait! Don't turn that dial! More excitement to come! The effects of story length and production pacing in local television news on channel changing behavior and information processing in a free choice environment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 49, 3-22.
  15. Leshner, G., Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1998). Switching channels: The effects of television channels on the mental representations of television news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 21-33.
  16. Morgan, S. E., Palmgreen, P., Stephenson, M. T., Hoyle, R. H., & Lorch, E. P. (2003). Associations between message features and subjective evaluations of the sensation value of antidrug public service announcements. Journal of Communication, 53, 512-526.
  17. Nabi, R. L., & Krcmar, M. (2004). Conceptualizing media enjoyment as attitude: Implications for mass media research. Communication Theory, 14(4), 288-310.
  18. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
  19. Potter, R. F., & Dillman Carpentier, F. R. (2005, May). Effects of music on physiological arousal: Explorations into genre and tempo. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, New York City, NY.
  20. Rubin, A. M., Perse, E. M., & Powell, R. A. (1985). Loneliness, parasocial interaction, and local television news viewing. Human Communication Research, 12(2), 155-180.
  21. Scott, D., & Gobetz, R. H. (1992). Hard news/soft news content of the national broadcast networks, 1972-1987. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 406-412.
  22. Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for news: Using biological and cultural evolution to explain the sur- veillance function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32-47.
  23. Slattery, K. L., Doremus, M., & Marcus, L. (2001). Shifts in public affairs reporting on the network evening news: A move toward the sensational. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 45, 290-302.
  24. Slattery, K. L., & Hakanen, E. A. (1994). Sensationalism versus public affairs content of local TV news: Pennsylvania revisited. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38, 205-216.
  25. Southwell, B., & Lee, M. (2004). A pitfall of new media? User controls exacerbate editing effects on memory. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 643-656.
  26. Zillmann, D. (1982). Television viewing and arousal. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health & Human Behavior, National Institute of Mental Health.
  27. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and sociobiological bases of sensation seeking. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vettehen, P. H., Nuijten, K., & Peeters, A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Breda University of Applied Sciences
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Venue
Communication Research
Published
2008-04-14
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
319-338
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W2108620471
Cited by
102
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
20.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communication Research (publishedVersion)
  • Breda University of Applied Sciences Portal (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Breda University of Applied Sciences Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
sensationalism, television news, emotional arousal, inverted U-shaped relationship, news appeal, media influence, news content analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review