Cited by 575Media Influence and PoliticsChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceMedia Studies and Communication

Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China

Stockmann, Daniela, Gallagher, Mary E.·2011·Comparative Political Studies

Abstract

This study examines the role of the media in sustaining regime stability in an authoritarian context. The article engages the recent work on authoritarian resilience in comparative politics but goes beyond the standard focus on elections to other important institutions, such as the media and courts, that are used by authoritarian leaders to bolster legitimacy. The authors find that the Chinese media contribute to regime legitimacy and effective rule by propagandizing citizens’ experiences in the legal system. However, unlike the “mouthpieces” of earlier communist regimes, the marketized Chinese media provide more convincing and sophisticated messages that continue to accord with state censorship demands while satisfying readers’ interest in real-life stories and problems. The “positive propaganda” and the relative uniformity of information sources because of state censorship lead aggrieved citizens to the law as a realm for dispute resolution and rights protection. Statistical analysis of a randomly sampled survey conducted in four Chinese cities in 2005 demonstrates that exposure to media reporting about labor-law-related issues successfully promotes the image of a proworker bias in the law among citizens, thus encouraging them to participate in the legal system. The state is able to achieve its political goal because of the lack of conflicting sources of information and the lack of previous experience with the reformed legal system among citizens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0010414010394773

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stockmann, D., & Gallagher, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Stockmann, Daniela
Venue
Comparative Political Studies
Published
2011-02-14
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
436-467
ISSN
  • 0010-4140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3829
OpenAlex
W2126933152
Cited by
575
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
55.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Political Studies (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
authoritarian resilience, regime legitimacy, state media, state censorship, legal system, labor law, citizen participation in courts, legal dispute resolution, protection of rights, Chinese media, regime stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review