Cited by 142Media Influence and HealthAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMedia and Digital Communication

Attachment, Belongingness Needs, and Relationship Status Predict Imagined Intimacy With Media Figures

Greenwood, Dara N., Long, Christopher R.·2011·Communication Research

Abstract

The present study uses an interpersonal relationships measure (Relationship Rating Form [RRF], Fraley & Davis, 1997) to assess both imagined intimacy with a favorite media figure and real intimacy with close others among 173 undergraduates. We examine how relational tendencies (attachment style, need to belong) and relationship status (single or partnered) interact to predict degree of imagined intimacy with same and opposite gender media figures. Results indicate that intimacy reported with a same gender friend is positively correlated with imagined intimacy for a same gender media figure. However, a compensatory pattern emerged with romantic relationships: single individuals reported greater imagined intimacy with opposite gender media figures than those in a relationship. Attachment anxiety and the need to belong (NTB) were positively predictive of imagined intimacy with opposite gender media figures for single individuals only. Social psychological motivations for media attachments are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093650210362687

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greenwood, D. N., & Long, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Vassar College (US)
  • Ouachita Baptist University (US)
Venue
Communication Research
Published
2010-10-04
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
278-297
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W2126931805
Cited by
142
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
131.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
media figures, celebrity attachment, attachment styles, attachment anxiety, need to belong, relationship status, romantic relationships, interpersonal relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review