Cited by 244Media Influence and HealthNarrative Theory and AnalysisSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived Realism: Dimensions and Roles in Narrative Persuasion

Cho, Hyunyi, Shen, Lijiang, Wilson, Kari·2014·Communication Research

Abstract

Perceived realism may be a crucial message characteristic facilitating narrative-based persuasion. This study examined dimensions of perceived realism and their roles in narrative persuasion. Data based on responses to messages on three topics showed that perceived realism was multidimensional. Its dimensions included plausibility, typicality, factuality, narrative consistency, and perceptual quality. Plausibility predicted emotional involvement, but not identification. Typicality predicted identification, but not emotional involvement. Narrative consistency and perceptual quality predicted message evaluation. Emotional involvement, identification, and message evaluation, in turn, predicted attitudes. Implications for theory, research, and message design pertinent to narrative persuasion are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0093650212450585

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1207/s15327663jcp0703_01 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02875.x · DOI
  3. 10.1080/15213261003799847 · DOI
  4. 10.1177/0093650207305233 · DOI
  5. 10.1080/08838159609364370 · DOI
  6. Brehm J. W., 1966, A theory of psychological reactance
  7. 10.1080/108107397127815 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00322.x · DOI
  9. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_05 · DOI
  10. Cacioppo J. T., 1981, Cognitive assessment, 309
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.4.805 · DOI
  12. 10.1207/S15327027HC1602_2 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/0093650207313158 · DOI
  14. 10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01939.x · DOI
  16. 10.1080/03637750500111815 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00308.x · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Dorr A., 1983, Children’s understanding of television: Research on attention and comprehension, 199
  20. 10.1177/0093650209351912 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/10810730802412248 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/00913367.2004.10639163 · DOI
  23. 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1976.tb02507.x · DOI
  24. 10.2105/AJPH.92.2.238 · DOI
  25. Fisher W. R., 1987, Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action
  26. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0403_04 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_5 · DOI
  29. 10.1075/idj.16.1.07gre · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02914.x · DOI
  31. 10.1177/009365027700400304 · DOI
  32. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/BF02879904 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/10810730903528017 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02252.x · DOI
  36. Mels G., 2004, LISREL 8.7 for Windows: Getting started guide
  37. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01408.x · DOI
  38. 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Moyer-Gusé E., 2010, Human Communication Research, 36, 25
  40. 10.1080/08838158609386617 · DOI
  41. 10.1080/15213260701285819 · DOI
  42. 10.1177/107769907805500404 · DOI
  43. 10.1207/S1532785XMEP0502_3 · DOI
  44. 10.4324/9781410609595 · DOI
  45. 10.1177/009365096023002003 · DOI
  46. Slater M. D., 1997, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association
  47. Slater M. D., 2002, Communication Theory, 12, 173
  48. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00017.x · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00843.x · DOI
  50. 10.1080/10510970209388598 · DOI
  51. 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.239 · DOI
  52. Zillmann D., 1980, The entertainment functions of television, 133

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cho, H., Shen, L., & Wilson, K.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Indiana University South Bend (US)
Venue
Communication Research
Published
2012-07-12
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
828-851
ISSN
  • 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3810
OpenAlex
W2086112047
Cited by
244
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communication Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
perceived realism, narrative persuasion, plausibility, typicality, factuality, narrative consistency, perceptual quality, emotional engagement, identification, message evaluation, attitude change, message design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review