Cited by 276Media Influence and HealthEvaluation and Performance AssessmentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

The relationship between the perceived and actual effectiveness of persuasive messages: a meta-analysis with implications for formative campaign research

Dillard, James Price, Weber, Kirsten M, Vail, Renata G.·2007·Journal of Communication

Abstract

Although measures of perceived message effectiveness are commonly employed in formative evaluation research, the validity of such measures has been assumed rather than demonstrated. A meta-analysis revealed a corrected-for-attenuation correlation of.41 between perceived effectiveness (PE) and attitude (k= 40). This association was apparently subject to the influence of moderator variables, although the pattern of influence was unstable across different types of analysis. Overall, the results empirically demonstrate the value of PE judgments in formative research and in circumstances in which actual effectiveness (AE) is difficult or impossible to measure. They also prompt a host of questions concerning (a) the causal relationship between PE and AE, (b) the possibility of bias in these judgments, and (c) the potential for developing methods to reduce or remove bias in effectiveness judgments. Future research is needed to corroborate these results as well as broaden the range of AE measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00360.x

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research has suggested that messages with higher perceived effectiveness ratings may be more effective than those with lower ratings.

    “These findings are noteworthy, as research has suggested that messages with higher perceived effectiveness ratings may be more effective than those with lower ratings.82–84”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Dillard, J. P., Weber, K. M., & Vail, R. G.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Czech Environmental Partnership Foundation (CZ)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
2007-12-12
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
613-631
ISSN
0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145914839
Cited by
276
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
FWCI
70.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
perceived message effectiveness, persuasive messages, formative assessment, attitude measurement, measurement validity, judgment bias, health campaigns, moderators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review