Cited by 2,357News Media Framing and Political CommunicationMedia Influence and HealthChild Development and Digital Technology

Living with Television: The Violence Profile

Gerbner, George, Gross, Larry·1976·Journal of Communication

Abstract

George Gerbner, Larry Gross; Living with Television: The Violence Profile, Journal of Communication, Volume 26, Issue 2, 1 June 1976, Pages 172–199, https:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1976.tb01397.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sociocultural and psycho-demographic factors can also moderate social media effects by strengthening, diminishing, and/or moderating individuals' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to media.

    “as suggested by the Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model [133] and Cultivation Theory [134], sociocultural and psycho-demographic factors can also moderate social media effects by strengthening, diminishing, and/or moderating individuals’ cognitive, emotional, and behavioral responses to media.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 1975, TV Violence and the Child; The Evolution and Fate of the Surgeon General's Report
  2. 1969, Variations in Generalizability Resulting from Sampling Characteristics of Content Analysis Data: A Case Study.” Unpublished manuscript
  3. 1976, with the assistance of Michael F. Eleey, Suzanne K. Fox, Marilyn Jackson-Beeck, and Nancy Signorielli
  4. 1969, Dimensions of Violence in Television Drama,” Chapter 15 in Violence and the Media
  5. 1972, Violence in Television Drama: Trends and Symbolic Functions
  6. 1973, Communications Technology and Social Policy
  7. 1972, The Structure and Process of Television Program Content Regulation in the U.S
  8. 1973, Cultural Indicators: The Third Voice
  9. 1975, Scenario for Violence, Human Behavior
  10. 1976, The Scary World of Television, Psychology Today
  11. 1973, A Computer Program for Agreement Analysis of Reliability Data
  12. Personal Safety a Major Concern: Public Perceptions of Quality of Life in Metropolitan Detroit Examined in ISR Study., 1976, ZSR Newsletter, 4

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerbner, G., & Gross, L.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Journal of Communication
Published
1976-06-01
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
172-199
ISSN
  • 0021-9916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2466
OpenAlex
W2072761879
Cited by
2,357
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 123 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 139 · 2022: 119 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 73 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 80
FWCI
326.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
television violence, media influence, television viewing, violence exposure
MeSH terms
Crime, Fear, Humans, Persuasive Communication, Research Design, Television, Violence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review