The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of News Frames on Readers' Thoughts and Recall
Abstract
This study investigated whether and how journalistic news frames affect readers' thoughts about and recall of two issues. A sample of 187 participants was randomly assigned to one of four experimental framing conditions, which included (a) conflict, (b) human interest, (c) attribution of responsibility, and (d) economic consequences, as well as a control condition. Each participant was presented with two newspaper stories that dealt with two socially and politically pertinent issues in Europe: crime and the introduction of the euro, the common European currency. Each story had an identical core component, whereas the title, opening paragraph, and closing paragraph were varied to reflect the frame. The study found that frames played a significant role in the readers' thought-listing responses, and they defined the ways that readers presented information about both issues. The results showed that the human interest news frame can have negative consequences for recall.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Cited by
Framing the Egyptian Uprising in Arabic Language Newspapers and Social Media
Hamdy, N., & Gomaa, E. H. (2012) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01637.x · Cited by 246
Effects of Lead Framing on Selective Exposure to Internet News Reports
Zillmann, D., Chen, L., Knobloch, S., & Callison, C. (2004) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650203260201 · Cited by 144
Bullock, C. F. (2011) · Howard Journal of Communications · doi:10.1080/10646175.2011.546747 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- VALKENBURG, P. M., SEMETKO, H. A., & DE VREESE, C. H.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 550-569
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2100387689
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
