The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs: Predicting Treatment Success with Young Offenders
Abstract
The rehabilitation of young offenders and their reintegration into society are important goals of the juvenile justice system. An empirically supported model of service delivery attending to the principles of risk level, criminogenic need, and responsivity provides direction in achieving these goals. Although research on this model thus far has evaluated the principles only at a group level, the present study evaluates the impact on recidivism of matching youth with services at the individual level. Files of 122 youth who received court assessments were reviewed to determine whether clinical recommendations and services received were congruent. Youths' criminal records were reviewed to determine reoffense outcomes. As predicted, higher risk scores were associated with earlier and more frequent recidivism. Knowing whether a young offender had his or her specific criminogenic needs addressed in treatment added to the predictive power of risk. Having only a few treatment needs met was associated with significantly earlier recidivism and a greater number of new convictions. These findings may provide direction in enhancing efforts to effectively respond to youth crime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: A meta-analysis
Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2000) · Canadian Journal of Criminology · doi:10.3138/cjcrim.42.4.449 · Cited by 367
Offender Rehabilitation: What We Know and What Needs to Be Done
GENDREAU, P. (1996) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854896023001010 · Cited by 255
Understanding Risk in the Context of the Youth Criminal Justice Act
Maurutto, P., & Hannah-Moffat, K. (2007) · Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice · doi:10.3138/cjccj.49.4.465 · Cited by 59
Cited by
Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/a0018362 · Cited by 1,223
Dynamic risk factors and timing of recidivism for youth in residential placement
Cuevas, C., Wolff, K. T., & Baglivio, M. T. (2019) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.10.003 · Cited by 35
Needle in a Haystack: Logical Parameters of Treatment Based on Actuarial Risk–Needs Assessments
Hannah‐Moffat, K. (2015) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12121 · Cited by 30
Matching needs to services: Prison treatment program allocations
Long, J. S., Sullivan, C., Wooldredge, J., Pompoco, A., & Lugo, M. (2019) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854818807952 · Cited by 30
Goldstein, N. E. S., Giallella, C. L., Haney-Caron, E., Peterson, L., Serico, J., Kemp, K., Romaine, C. R., Zelechoski, A. D., Holliday, S. B., Kalbeitzer, R., et al. (2018) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/ser0000184 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Vieira, T. A., Skilling, T. A., & Peterson-Badali, M.
- Venue
- Criminal Justice and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 385-401
- ISSN
- 0093-8548 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3594
- OpenAlex
- W2135071129
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 47.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs: Predicting Treatment Success with Young Offenders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0093854808331249
- The paper
- Vieira, T. A., Skilling, T. A., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2009). Matching Court-Ordered Services with Treatment Needs: Predicting Treatment Success with Young Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854808331249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.