The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains
Abstract
Public sectors struggle with professionalism. Classic professions are weakened, welfare state occupations professionalize, and public managers try to become professionals. This raises questions. What is professionalism? What is professional control in ambiguous occupational domains? What happens when different types of occupational control get mixed up? The first question is answered by portraying classic professionalism as “controlled content.” The second question is answered by tracing a transition from “pure” to “hybrid” professionalism in domains such as health care and social work. The third question is answered by portraying present-day professionalism as “content of control” instead of controlled content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
The Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Cited by
Evans, L. (2014) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2013.860083 · Cited by 227
Cox, A. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24635 · Cited by 200
The bargaining of professionalism in emergency care practice: NHS paramedics and higher education
Givati, A., Markham, C., & Street, K. (2018) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-017-9802-1 · Cited by 73
Jacobsen, C. B., Hansen, A. L., & Pedersen, L. D. (2023) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13566 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Noordegraaf, M.
- Venue
- Administration & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 761-785
- ISSN
- 0095-3997 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3039
- OpenAlex
- W2063983969
- Cited by
- 690
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0095399707304434
- The paper
- Noordegraaf, M. (2007). From “Pure” to “Hybrid” Professionalism: Present-Day Professionalism in Ambiguous Public Domains. Administration & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707304434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
