Cited by 26Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCritical Race Theory in EducationQualitative Research Methods and Ethics

A Call to Arms for Researchers Studying Racial Identity

Sellers, Robert M.·1993·Journal of Black Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00957984930193008

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on the long history of white supremacy shaping U.S. society, as well as the writings of early ERI scholars, white pride cannot carry the same meaning as Black or Latinx pride, and a sense of belonging to whiteness does not signify positive ethnic group belonging.

    “Based on the long history of white supremacy shaping U.S. society, as well as the writings of early ERI scholars (Phinney, 1996; Sellers, 1993), the answer to these questions is clearly “no.””

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sellers, R. M.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Sellers, Robert M.
Venue
Journal of Black Psychology
Published
1993-08
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
327-332
ISSN
  • 0095-7984 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4558
OpenAlex
W2066842433
Cited by
26
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Black Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
Keywords
racial identity, Black psychology, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review